Search for: "Fine v. Fine"
Results 7801 - 7820
of 16,017
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Mar 2015, 9:01 pm
The FPPC found the Mormon Church guilty on 13 counts of election fraud and fined them. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 6:49 am
State v. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 5:54 am
* Meet David King of King v. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 5:10 am
Following Padilla, Minnesota courts have made a distinction between collateral and direct consequences of a plea in determining the reasonableness of an attorney's performance, and have held that attorneys must advise their clients of only direct consequences of a plea, such as `the maximum sentence to be imposed and the amount of any fine,’ Alanis v. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 2:53 pm
The problem here was the high threshold of evidence set out in R (Unison) v Lord Chancellor [2014] EWHC 218 (Admin), reported at [2014] ICR 498, R (Tabbakh) v Staffordshire and West Midlands Probation Trust [2014] EWCA Civ 827, and the second Unison case, R (Unison) v Lord Chancellor (No. 2) [2014] EWHC 4198 (Admin). [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 1:09 pm
Later, in Kemp v. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 1:09 pm
New city manager will make sure we are fine in that issue. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 7:43 am
The case is PP v. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 7:17 am
Here are the leading legal headlines from Wise Law on Twitter:Hill media fight over harassment policy, some say it could destroy Parliamentary Press GalleryNon-Competition Provision Results In Increased Notice Period By BC CourtConrad Black permanently banned as director or officer of any Ontario public company 100 academics urge major changes to ‘dangerous’ anti-terrorism billUS Navy judge lifts order banning female guards from touching Guantanamo interneesCanada’s Davis LLP… [read post]
1 Mar 2015, 9:01 pm
Riley v. [read post]
1 Mar 2015, 5:56 am
NFL Players Association v. [read post]
28 Feb 2015, 3:15 pm
I’ve also been hugely exercised by the Foolscap v A4 references in Re L. [read post]
28 Feb 2015, 11:03 am
So, I was reading United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 2:49 pm
This case did not require finely tuning that answer. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 7:21 am
"Or they would get a court order, and... they would seize all my computers, cell phones, ban me from using the internet, fine me thousands of dollars and jail me for up to two years. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 4:00 am
Yesterday, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in EEOC v. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 7:54 am
Fine. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 1:49 pm
I think Crawford v. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 10:00 am
Nicosia v. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 9:49 am
In Webb v. [read post]
