Search for: "Gooding v. United States" Results 7801 - 7820 of 21,084
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jul 2017, 10:04 pm by Barry Barnett
The Second Circuit had held that “for ‘securities that are not traded on a domestic exchange,’ a transaction is considered ‘domestic if [1] irrevocable liability is incurred or [2] title passes within the United States.'” Petrobras, slip op. at 22 (quoting Absolute Activist Value Master Fund Ltd. v. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 11:51 am by Sara Hutchins Jodka
Sutter, a case addressing an arbitration clause that was silent as to whether it permitted class-wide arbitration, the United States Supreme Court held that so long as an arbitrator's decision construes the parties' contract, the arbitrator has not "exceeded his powers" – which would permit a court to vacate the decision under §10(a)(4) of the Federal Arbitration Act (“FAA”) – and the arbitrator’s constructions should be upheld, “however… [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 10:30 am by Robin Mashal
Mashal has been admitted to the State Bar of California and the Bar of the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 12:41 pm
The words “citizens of the United States,” and “citizens of the States,” as employed in the fourteenth amendment, did not change or modify the relations of citizens of the State and nation as they existed under the original Constitution. . . . [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 3:22 pm
A defendant who didn’t make that request clearly enough was unsuccessful in his appeal in United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2007, 7:08 am
A few years ago, there wasn't much of any good bankruptcy history. [read post]
1 Sep 2016, 8:54 am
Constitution's Supremacy Clause, "the laws of the United States . . . shall be the supreme law of the land . . . the law of any State to the contrary notwithstanding. [read post]
2 Oct 2012, 4:35 am by Andrew Trask
Aside from being yet another good explanation of overbroad class definitions, the court also explained why the doctrine of comity--as discussed in Smith v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 8:06 am by Guest Author
United States, litigants have also asked the Court to find presidential removal powers and immunities that lack an explicit basis in the Constitution’s text. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 7:24 am by Kenneth J. Vanko
The same is true of particular customers that an employer contends falls within a non-solicitation clause. -- Court: United States District Court for the District of Maryland Opinion Date: 7/11/11 Cite: SNS One, Inc. v. [read post]