Search for: "Line v. People"
Results 7801 - 7820
of 13,534
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Feb 2016, 10:12 am
Maybe we need to balance incentives for marginal artists v. incentives for most popular, instead of incentives v. access. [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 6:30 am
If parents have a right to send their children to private schools, as Pierce v. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 12:38 pm
” In Matrixx Initiatives Inc. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 9:19 pm
Next Tuesday, December 8, the Court will take up the case of Evenwel v. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 3:51 am
opan style='font:7.0pt "Times New Roman"'> SCOTUS docket hereRicci v. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 1:51 am
Heritage includes the aspects of the environment arising from the interaction between people and their environment over time. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 1:51 am
Heritage includes the aspects of the environment arising from the interaction between people and their environment over time. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 4:08 pm
John Taylor v. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 9:01 pm
Norquist states that his pledge is self-enforcing—”candidates and incumbents solemnly bind themselves”—but in a leading case cited in the Standler essay (above), Schaefer v. [read post]
5 Dec 2006, 9:08 pm
Reynolds v. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 2:34 pm
The total rents from patents are larger than the total costs; similarly true for university patent licensing income v. costs overall, even w/a lot of losers. [read post]
26 Jul 2022, 5:55 am
On June 24, 2022, the Supreme Court in Dobbs v. [read post]
14 Aug 2018, 5:33 am
Will it be a state in which one ethnicity dominates another—the prospect that many people see in the recent passage by the Knesset of a new Basic Law on Israel as the nation state of the Jewish people? [read post]
10 May 2023, 2:30 pm
From Collins v. [read post]
18 Jul 2024, 1:30 pm
From U.S. v. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 12:44 pm
People’s Insurance Counsel v. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 8:22 am
Yesterday the Georgia Supreme Court heard oral arguments in the case of Nestlehutt v. [read post]
24 Nov 2015, 9:23 am
The challengers rely heavily upon a ruling in 2000 by the Supreme Court, in Rice v. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 2:32 pm
The decision just came down in a case called Bland v. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 7:17 am
The sex line in Section 2 also indicates that most of the people who voted to propose and ratify the 14th Amendment did not believe in sex equality. [read post]
