Search for: "Lively v. State"
Results 7801 - 7820
of 29,025
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Feb 2023, 12:33 pm
Access to abortion has been decimated in the United States since June when the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 8:44 pm
State, 2011 Fla. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 10:35 pm
And even so, the State failed to live up to the plan, lowering its required contribution in 2006 and 2007 by 56 and 45 percent, respectively. [read post]
8 Aug 2010, 10:00 pm
Plus, many people don't even know which state legislative district they live in. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 7:44 pm
Read the North Carolina Supreme Court decision in Boseman v. [read post]
21 May 2020, 4:24 am
V. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 3:17 am
Third, amidst the usual welter of authorities being discussed, it was particularly interesting to see the Irish cases (Donegan v Dublin CC [2008] IEHC 288; Dublin CC v Gallagher [2008] IEHC 354) being drawn on in this context, although they are a bit of a sideshow. [read post]
1 Sep 2016, 7:15 am
The Pennsylvania Superior Court recently reversed and remanded a defendant’s DUI convictions in light of the United States Supreme Court’s holding in Missouri v. [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 8:06 am
Undoubtedly, the decision in Matal v. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 10:02 am
In Naruto v. [read post]
30 Oct 2014, 9:21 pm
United States (1944), which upheld the internment of over 100,000 Japanese-Americans during World War II. [read post]
1 Sep 2016, 7:15 am
The Pennsylvania Superior Court recently reversed and remanded a defendant’s DUI convictions in light of the United States Supreme Court’s holding in Missouri v. [read post]
22 Nov 2007, 1:13 pm
Reporting on the COA's Nov. 9th decision in Christina Roush v. [read post]
21 Sep 2018, 2:51 pm
The uncertainty regarding the rescission of the H-4 EAD Rule continues to drag on and the plaintiffs in Save Jobs USA v. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 3:33 pm
District Court for the Western District of Missouri (EEOC, et al. v. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 10:09 am
Plaintiff Hall lived in Happy Jack, Arizona. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 10:59 am
Moreover, state legislatures and courts have also applied the statute to state laws (and Meyer v. [read post]
10 May 2023, 2:21 am
In that case, in contrast to this, there was an ongoing state of affairs outside the claimant’s land, constituted by the living tree and its roots, for which the defendant was responsible and which, by further abstraction of water through the encroachment of the roots, caused continuing undue interference with the use and enjoyment of the claimant’s land. [read post]
3 Jan 2022, 3:35 am
Both courts relied on a 1997 state Supreme Court decision, Snyder v. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 3:06 pm
The case is Caperton v. [read post]
