Search for: "Short v. United States" Results 7801 - 7820 of 10,141
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Mar 2010, 2:47 pm by Beck, et al.
Microsoft Corp., 309 F.3d 193, 202 (4th Cir. 2002) (“allegations must be stated in terms that are neither vague nor conclusory’”); Browning v. [read post]
19 Nov 2011, 2:51 am by SHG
  My personal belief is that he's preparing a run for the Republican nomination for President of the United States of America, expecting his campaign to be financed by his good friends at Comcast. [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 6:07 pm by Jeffrey P. Gale, P.A.
(Fla., 2016), the Florida Supreme Court declared unconstitutional, as a violation of due process under the Florida and United States constitutions, the provisions of 440.34 restricting fees to the statutory formula. [read post]
2 Jun 2022, 11:00 am by Sandy Levinson
  To count as a "sport," how much “skill” is involved, and who defines what counts as a skill (like the ability to ingest dozens of hotdogs, especially if they’re mushy, in a short sitting)? [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 7:58 am by Joy Waltemath
United States Department of Labor, settlement agreements entered into after a suit has been filed were potentially unenforceable because such agreements were subject to the crucible of the adversarial system. [read post]
13 Aug 2023, 9:05 pm by renholding
This contradicts what we know about who purchases cryptocurrency in the United States and why. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 3:00 am by SHG
United States, 491 U.S. 617 (1989) and United States v. [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 2:42 am by SHG
 On the one hand, there is the standard from United States v. [read post]
22 Jul 2012, 10:22 pm by Leland E. Beck
  At the end of judicial review, the United States Court of Appeals decided three sets of petitions for review of EPA rules, denying all of the petitions. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 3:14 pm by Kent Scheidegger
  For instance, he might set a criminal free for a reason which has nothing to do with the reliability of the evidence or the justice of the case.Orin Kerr at VC has this post on United States v. [read post]
21 May 2011, 10:45 pm
See also United States v. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 11:56 am by Jonathan Shaub
The obstruction charge does include a statement that the charged actions were “consistent with President Trump’s previous efforts to undermine United States Government investigations into foreign interference in United States elections. [read post]
18 May 2021, 5:01 am by George Croner
Targeting, however, is constrained by specific limitations included by Congress that prohibit targeting anyone known to be in the United States; prohibit targeting any U.S. person located outside the United States; prohibit targeting someone outside the United States for the purpose of targeting a particular, known person in this country; prohibit the intentional acquisition of any communication where all participants are located in the… [read post]