Search for: "State of California v. United States" Results 7801 - 7820 of 13,843
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Mar 2015, 8:17 am by Keelin Curran
Moreover, state laws in some cases (such as California, Oregon and Washington) provide as much or more protection to pregnant workers than provided by the PDA and the ADA (see this DOL chart comparing state laws). [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 8:49 pm by Lawrence Solum
Here is the abstract: Political process theory, closely associated with the work of John Hart Ely and footnote four in United States v. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
The plaintiffs emphasize the long history of Virginia mandating disclosure of race as a means of enforcing the state’s anti-miscegenation laws prior to the Supreme Court’s 1967 decision in Loving v. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 10:20 am
Youngblood and California v. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 6:15 am by John Elwood
United States, 14-361, involves a bribery ring in Baltimore under which the owners of a car-repair shop paid police officers to refer to them business resulting from the car collisions to which they responded. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 10:13 am by Erik Weibust and Andrew Stark
This could create confusion in states in which the inevitable disclosure doctrine is not permitted by state law (e.g., California, Maryland, and Virginia). [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 9:11 am by John Elwood
California, 14-5442, involved whether a state court reviewing a Batson v. [read post]
1 May 2015, 4:25 am by Amy Howe
United States, in which the Court recently heard reargument on whether the residual clause of the Armed Career Criminal Act is unconstitutionally vague. [read post]
27 Nov 2009, 3:29 pm by Mary Whisner
The presentation will include a review of the federal court litigation filed in Seattle that eventually led to the United States Supreme Court 2006 landmark Hamdan v. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 9:00 am
The court disagreed, relying on the fact that the United States Supreme Court in Ransom vs. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 12:21 am
"   Leahy Lashes Out at Citizens United Ruling "Continuing the Capitol Hill drumbeat against the Supreme Court that President Barack Obama started last night in his State of the Union address, Senate Judiciary Committee chairman Patrick Leahy this morning called the Court's decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 4:14 pm
For example, if A has sued B in state court for trademark infringement, and the case is about to be decided, a federal court should stay proceedings in the case of B v. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:00 pm
State, 367 Md. 348, 353, 787 A.2d 152, 155 (2001), “‘[c]omment upon a defendant’s failure to testify in a criminal trial was prohibited in Maryland before the United States Supreme Court, in Griffin v. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 10:00 am by Judy Selby
Although the Court relied exclusively on other district court decisions with regard to its injury in fact ruling, the outcome here is consistent with the United States Supreme Court’s recent decision in Clapper v. [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 1:58 pm by Eugene Volokh
La Liberte sued Reid for defamation in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York…. [read post]