Search for: "State v. Word"
Results 7801 - 7820
of 40,667
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jul 2020, 3:48 am
[¶] No actual corporate benefit has been stated and there is no evidence that proper judgment was exercised either. [read post]
19 Jul 2020, 9:05 pm
In County of Maui v. [read post]
19 Jul 2020, 7:00 pm
Delaware’s High Court ruled in Murfey v. [read post]
19 Jul 2020, 4:41 pm
This is illustrated by the recent decision of the Supreme Court of British Columbia in Pirani v. [read post]
19 Jul 2020, 10:04 am
Abrams' opinion in Reynolds v. [read post]
19 Jul 2020, 9:17 am
Kahn v. [read post]
19 Jul 2020, 7:17 am
” Ferrer acknowledged that the term might be “some kind of bizarre new code word for an under aged person. [read post]
18 Jul 2020, 9:40 am
At that time Colorado had two strong Defense of Marriage provisions, one in the Constitution and the other statutory, not only barring the celebration of same-sex marriages in the state but denying in-state recognition to valid out-of-state same-sex marriages.[4] The federal government had its own DOMA.[5] But Massachusetts had recognized same-sex marriage.[6]Phillips met with them personally and, when he heard that the cake was intended as a celebration… [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 7:56 pm
In other words, if the other contracting party is selling Miami Dolphins’ season tickets, states that the NFL declared that the season will not be affected by the pandemic. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 2:35 pm
These four words trigger a far more mundane process that is typical to all courts. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 10:46 am
Ass’n of United States, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 10:34 am
AOL and Reno v. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 10:17 am
In Matal v. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 9:46 am
In other words, that there was a fundamental and official “legal break” and discontinuity in American constitutionalism necessitating a refounding and, yes, thus a new Constitution.Baude and Sachs’s position is an excellent example of what I term “Civil War denialism” which I see as quite widespread among judges and lawyers. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 8:31 am
From Edward Snowden to Luxembourg The case, Data Protection Commissioner v. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 8:14 am
” In other words, this lawsuit sought to advance censorship, while anti-SLAPP laws are designed to curb censorship. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 6:40 am
” In Bell v. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 6:30 am
In other words, the race analogy works, but not in the way Professor Koppelman describes. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 6:08 am
“Since an attorney-client relationship does not depend on the existence of a formal retainer agreement or upon payment of a fee, a court must look to the words and actions of the parties to ascertain the existence of such a relationship” (Nelson v Kalathara, 48 AD3d 528, 529 [2d Dept 2008] [citation omitted]; see also Matter of Priest v Hennessy, 51 NY2d 62, 71 [1980] [payment of fee by third party does not create attorney-client relationship between attorney… [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 3:30 am
Justice Neil Gorsuch recently emphasized this in the majority opinion in Bostock v. [read post]
