Search for: "Exist Inc" Results 7821 - 7840 of 25,380
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Sep 2017, 6:55 am by Stephen Bilkis
Summary judgment may be granted only when it is clear that no triable issue of fact exists (see e.g. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 4:00 am by Monica Goyal
Lovelace Motor Freight, Inc., 940 F.2d 564, 574 (10th Cir. 1991)). [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 1:33 pm by Wolfgang Demino
See earlier post on Lucinda Vine and Kristy Pond v PLS Financial Services, Inc. and PLS Loan Store of Texas, Inc., No. 16-50847 (5th Cir. [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 8:50 am by Matthew Moriarty
After evaluating competitive proposals, the USMC gave the award to Information Science Consulting, Inc., a Manassas, Virginia, company. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 4:00 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
According to existing Fifth Circuit precedent, a workplace rule violates Section 8(a)(1) of the NLRA if the rule either: “Explicitly restricts activities protected by Section 7″ or Employees would reasonably construe the language to prohibit Section 7 activity even if the rule does not explicitly prohibit or has not been enforced to prohibit or restrict Section 7 protected activity. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 4:00 am by Administrator
A holding company, aptly named Shield Investments Inc., contains millions of dollars worth of Mr. [read post]
12 Sep 2017, 9:24 am by Eugene Volokh
The company is Solvera Group Inc., run by Chris Dinota (the complaint labels both as “Solvera Defendants”) and operating under the names Instant Complaint Removers, InstantComplaintRemovers.com and DefamationRemoval.com. [read post]
12 Sep 2017, 8:30 am by Merritt Baer, Chinmayi Sharma
Gap, Inc., the court assumed the existence of a duty between job applicants and a prospective employer. [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 8:20 am by Law Office of Jason M. Hatfield
This conclusion was affirmed by the Arkansas Court of Appeals in Multi-Craft Contractors, Inc., and Gallagher Bassett v. [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 7:24 am by David Strifling
In April, the Supreme Court accepted review of Tetra Tech EC, Inc. v. [read post]