Search for: "Marks v. State "
Results 7821 - 7840
of 21,693
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 May 2017, 1:49 pm
Steve Vladeck and Benjamin Wittes argued that important caveats to the Nixon v. [read post]
10 May 2017, 6:15 am
"A Path to America, Marked by More and More Bodies," New York Times, 4 May 2017 [text]A Revolving Door No More? [read post]
9 May 2017, 7:30 am
The “presumption of regularity” that attaches to all federal officials’ actions, United States v. [read post]
9 May 2017, 4:59 am
Yesterday afternoon, the Fourth Circuit, sitting en banc, heard two hours of argument in IRAP v. [read post]
9 May 2017, 4:42 am
The CJEU held in Case C-322/10 Medeva BV v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks [2011] ECR I-12051 that it was necessary for the product to be "specified" or "identified" in the wording of the claims. [read post]
9 May 2017, 4:05 am
In Benitez v. [read post]
8 May 2017, 10:17 am
GuestKats and InternKat I BREAKING: Birss J hands down first FRAND decision in Unwired Planet v Huawei I Retromark: a year in trade marks I Can a public domain artwork be registered as a trade mark or would that be contrary to public policy and morality? [read post]
8 May 2017, 6:34 am
Is there any way that Bayer v. [read post]
8 May 2017, 1:45 am
Data Privacy and Data Protection In the case of R (P) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2017] EWCA Civ 321, the Court of Appeal held that the revised statutory scheme for the disclosure of convictions required further amendment as its operation in individual cases remained deficient. [read post]
7 May 2017, 5:53 pm
Further, the decision threatens to undercut precedent from key FRAND licensing court decisions, such as the CJEU's Huawei v ZTE C-170/13 or the UK's Unwired Planet v Huawei [2017] EWHC 711. [read post]
7 May 2017, 8:52 am
” Louisiana v. [read post]
7 May 2017, 3:00 am
However, the Archivist of the United States certified the amendment as ratified under Article V of the Constitution, and published it in the federal register. [read post]
5 May 2017, 11:24 am
” Pennzoil–Quaker State Co. v.United States, 511 F.3d 1365, 1373 (Fed. [read post]
5 May 2017, 6:00 am
by Mark Kantor and Karl Bayer In National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. [read post]
5 May 2017, 5:23 am
CASE NAME: Jose Cervantes v. [read post]
5 May 2017, 5:23 am
CASE NAME: Jose Cervantes v. [read post]
5 May 2017, 3:00 am
Supreme Court held in Miller v. [read post]
5 May 2017, 12:16 am
Judge Walker writes in the first China Cases InsightTM, titled In Qihu v. [read post]
4 May 2017, 11:12 pm
A recent example of the court’s flexibility can be seen in Arnold J’s recent judgment in FAPL v BT [2017] EWHC 480 Ch. [read post]
