Search for: "State of California v. United States"
Results 7821 - 7840
of 13,843
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 May 2014, 9:08 am
United States Attorney Laura E. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 11:40 am
” If a majority of the Justices choose to side with the State of California and open the floodgates to a new era of speech regulation, I very much looking forward to seeing how they reconcile that with their decision last term in the controversial case of United States v. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 1:50 pm
Arias v. [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 6:54 am
” (HuffPost) The FBI had been surveilling Muslims in Southern California, home to the second-largest Muslim population in the United States, since late 2001. [read post]
1 Aug 2010, 7:00 am
In Smith v. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 8:52 pm
United States. [read post]
18 Jan 2010, 3:37 pm
There was also a spirited exchange between District Judge Korman (Senior United States District Judge for the Eastern District of New York, sitting by designation), who concurred in the decision, and Circuit Judge Rymer, who dissented. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 5:58 am
United States – which he describes as a “rare criminal case where the defendant is right” – and Sprint Communications v. [read post]
14 May 2012, 6:29 am
” At UPI, Michael Kirkland discusses the impact of the Court’s ruling in Citizens United v. [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 2:49 am
United States v. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 10:59 am
” United Auburn Indian Community of the Auburn Rancheria v. [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
” I have no particular brief for high Federalists from New England, but I do wonder what we might think had Garrison actually been influential and several New England states accepted his view and tried to secede, say, after the Supreme Court’s decision in Prigg v. [read post]
9 Oct 2024, 8:00 am
United Road Services Inc., No. 4:19-cv-08404 (N.D. [read post]
24 Aug 2022, 11:18 am
After all, "it is our law and our tradition that more speech, not less, is the governing rule," Citizens United v. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 11:53 am
The qui tam cases are captioned United States ex rel. [read post]
4 Dec 2017, 9:01 pm
In Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 11:13 am
In particular, code enforcement often does not follow the law, whether it is the City’s own processes in the municipal code, a charter provision, California law when applicable, or the California or United States Constitution. [read post]
11 Jun 2007, 8:26 am
Sprint/United Management Co. v. [read post]
20 Sep 2023, 5:42 am
Elzeftawy v. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 12:31 pm
Custis, PC, Cheyenne, Wyoming.Representing State: Bruce A. [read post]
