Search for: "State v. Price"
Results 7821 - 7840
of 13,225
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Sep 2007, 2:28 pm
Price v. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
”[23] This violated Supreme Court precedent because “utilizing a back-end price drop as a proxy for [a] front end misrepresentation’s price impact works only if, at the front end, the misrepresentation is propping up the price. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 12:35 pm
Davis v. [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 9:59 pm
Sandoz and Sandoz v. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 2:40 pm
In Davis v. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 11:42 am
Google is free to pay crazy prices for patents. [read post]
18 Aug 2022, 11:04 am
” United States v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 9:49 am
V. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 4:00 am
" They haggle and eventually settle on a price of $7500.Paul has committed a federal crime of receiving goods valued at over $5,000 that he knows to be stolen and that crossed state lines. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 11:54 am
I can only hope it provokes a review of the adequacy of the measures available to combat the international trade in fake goods by preventing their transhipment through Member States. [read post]
9 Aug 2024, 1:53 pm
United States v Google LLC, 20-cv-3010 (APM) (D.D.C. [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 7:30 am
Ass’n v. [read post]
20 May 2009, 9:10 am
In a 2008 decision, Fair Price Medical Supply v. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 8:40 am
Lastly, United States v. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 7:09 am
The Bottom Line: In a unanimous decision (with Justice Kennedy not participating), the Supreme Court issued a decision in RadLAX Gateway Hotel, LLC v. [read post]
11 Sep 2019, 2:00 am
Supreme Court held in a 1989 case, Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
11 Sep 2019, 2:00 am
Supreme Court held in a 1989 case, Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
24 Sep 2017, 4:00 am
Victory Motors (Abbotsford) Ltd. v. [read post]
Federal Court of Appeal’s Decision in Mohr Provides Guidance Under Section 48 of the Competition Act
25 Aug 2022, 12:37 pm
Our experience includes advising clients in Toronto, Canada and the United States on the application of Canadian competition and regulatory laws and we have worked on hundreds of domestic and cross-border competition, advertising and marketing, promotional contest (sweepstakes), conspiracy (cartel), abuse of dominance, compliance, refusal to deal and pricing and distribution matters. [read post]
11 Sep 2008, 2:21 am
In July of 2007, I was the attorney for the defendant in the divorce of Sullivan v. [read post]
