Search for: "State v. Seven"
Results 7821 - 7840
of 11,120
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Dec 2011, 11:02 am
” The case was argued seven weeks ago. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 4:53 pm
The most significant decision was that of the Constitutional Court in April, in the case of Robert Mcbride v The Citizen ([2011] ZACC 11)(see the Inforrm post). [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 1:35 pm
See Brinkley v. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 10:55 am
Webster v. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 10:37 am
Webster v. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 10:12 am
Webster v. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 9:56 am
#1 — DiCosolo v. [read post]
26 Dec 2011, 6:04 am
State v. [read post]
26 Dec 2011, 2:00 am
State v. [read post]
24 Dec 2011, 9:25 am
(1-A) Where the Court grants an interim order under sub-section (1), it shall forthwith cause a notice being not less than seven days notice, together with a copy of such order to be served on the Public Prosecutor and the Superintendent of Police, with a view to give the Public Prosecutor a reasonable opportunity of being heard when the application shall be finally heard by the Court. [read post]
24 Dec 2011, 8:26 am
In a case reported in last week's New York Law Journal, Midland Funding, LLC DBA in New York as Midland Funding of Delaware, LLC v. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 12:12 pm
In Hines v. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 12:12 pm
In Hines v. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 7:27 am
All in all, it took six legal procedures and seven years for the parties to reach the ECJ, the European Court of Justice. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 2:46 pm
In Hines v. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 2:46 pm
In Hines v. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 11:58 am
On December 8, 2011, the United States Tax Court issued an opinion in Whistleblower v. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 11:17 am
Supreme Court in Caperton v. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 4:22 am
Mr Terluk appealed on seven grounds, saying the damages were too high and the trial was not fair because it was conducted without a jury and without him having legal representation. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 7:43 am
Many of these cases have been decided 5-4, with one or more concurring opinions (Salazar v. [read post]
