Search for: "Superior Court of California" Results 7821 - 7840 of 10,170
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Apr 2010, 10:31 am by Abbott & Kindermann
(d); CEQA Guidelines, § 15112, subdivision (d)(2). ) Reversing the decisions of both the superior and appellate courts, the Supreme Court found that flaws in the decision-making process underlying a facially valid and properly filed NOE do not prevent the NOE from triggering the 35-day period to file a lawsuit challenging the agency’s approval of a CEQA-exempt project.Developer A.G. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 3:06 am by Giovanni Comandé
Unlike many legal commentators that have criticized the European Courts, we conclude that the approach of the Courts is justified both from a purely legal standpoint and from a Law and Economics perspective. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 1:03 am by JW Verret
 Unless you have a particular geographic link to Delaware, it may be best not to apply to clerkships with the Delaware Superior Court,  as that court gets little corporate experience in the way for which Delaware is known. [read post]
10 Apr 2010, 11:09 pm by lawmrh
” The Arizona Court followed the lead of California in Howard v. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 7:25 am by Dr. Shezad Malik
The wrongful-death lawsuit, filed in Vista Superior Court, alleges that Tiffany St. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 7:14 am by Matt C. Bailey
Defendant’s motions targeted the elements of Rule 23(b)(3) (i.e. predominance and superiority), which the Court acknowledged had previously been met primarily due to Fedex’s uniform policy of classifying all managers as exempt. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 9:18 pm by The Complex Litigator
Superior Court, 34 Cal. 4th 319 (2004), the upshot appears to be that, once a trial court picks a side, a Court of Appeal is unlikely to get involved. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 5:55 pm by Cal Law
[Kate Moser]Endorsements from political heavyweights keep rolling in for San Francisco Superior Court Judge Richard Ulmer. [read post]
2 Apr 2010, 5:36 pm by Dr. Shezad Malik
Murray is unable to practice medicine in Texas, and especially Nevada, he will likely be faced with the inability to adequately defend himself of the charges facing him in the Superior Court of California," his lawyers wrote. [read post]
2 Apr 2010, 2:59 pm by Mike Aylward
  More recently, the California Court of Appeal has ruled in Risely v. [read post]
2 Apr 2010, 9:50 am by Greenberg Glusker
Rights of Old Oil Do Not Trump Needs of New Residents; Related CEQA Lawsuit Against LA County Set for April 5th Trial Greenberg Glusker today announced that the Los Angeles Superior Court has upheld the right of its client, the City of Culver City, California, to regulate expansion and intensification of new oil well drilling in order to protect its residents. [read post]
2 Apr 2010, 9:50 am
Rights of Old Oil Do Not Trump Needs of New Residents; Related CEQA Lawsuit Against LA County Set for April 5th Trial Greenberg Glusker today announced that the Los Angeles Superior Court has upheld the right of its client, the City of Culver City, California, to regulate expansion and intensification of new oil well drilling in order to protect its residents. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 12:45 pm by Cal Law
Harman is better known as a Republican state senator who represents California’s 35th District. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 12:07 pm by Rob
Superior Court (1990) 220 Cal.App.3d 864, 877) The problem is compounded by the fact that different agencies can come to different conclusions. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 11:32 am
Yesterday, March 30th, in Department 11 of the El Cajon Superior Court in San Diego, Judge Peter Deddeh sentenced Melvin Pearles, 48, to four years in state prison while driving head-on into another vehicle while speeding on State Route 67 in Ramona, causing an horrific fatal crash. 25-year-old Alexandia Drake was killed in the crash, while her 4-month old son miraculously survived. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 6:00 am by Steven Peck
Two Bay Area men who run Advanced Estate Planning Consultants targeted senior citizens for "worthless" but expensive advice, claiming they could "pre-qualify" their victims "for Medi-Cal benefits," a class action claims in Superior Court. [read post]