Search for: "US v. Levelle Grant"
Results 7821 - 7840
of 9,109
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jun 2010, 11:05 pm
After giving the B-K's expert short shrift, the district court granted summary judgment of invalidity by obviousness for the asserted claims. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 7:34 pm
The staggering consequences of the spill force us to ask whether applicable laws are fair, consistent, and up-to-date. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 1:34 pm
Sheridan v. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 7:15 am
The Fifth Circuit en banc dismissed the appeal in Comer v. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 7:00 am
Both noted that the Supreme Court was about to weigh in on the Ledbetter Act for the first time in Lewis v. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 4:56 am
The Stanley Works (Docket Report) District Court C D California: Failure to allege lack of substantial noninfringing use sinks contributory infringement claim: Clayton v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 5:03 pm
It granted a writ overturning the administrative decision to suspend Manriquez's driving privilege. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 10:04 am
Click Here US District Court Decision in US v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 9:54 am
Click Here US District Court Decision in US v. [read post]
5 Jun 2010, 6:17 am
All very important issues, but does it rise to the level of filing an Emergency Ex-Parte Injunction? [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 10:20 am
No Pet Policy Does Not Violate State or Federal Fair Housing Acts Hawn v. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 9:13 am
Facts: Crispin sued Audigier, alleging that Crispin granted Audigier an oral license to use some of Crispin's works of art in connection with the manufacture of garments by Audigier. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 8:15 pm
We thank Slaw’s editor, Professor Simon Fodden, for granting permission to repost.] [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 3:34 am
Harrell v. [read post]
31 May 2010, 6:00 am
In Newhall v. [read post]
29 May 2010, 8:41 pm
Session V (Infringement Exemptions, Fair Use, and Exhaustion) Patent Act §287(c)(1): methods of surgery are patentable, but not enforceable against doctors, helping personnel, or institutions in which they’re done—Dan Burk says it’s a complicated and unclear provision. [read post]
28 May 2010, 4:39 am
In Barrett v. [read post]
27 May 2010, 11:23 am
[Post by Venkat] Facebook v. [read post]
27 May 2010, 10:56 am
The case is McComish, et al., v. [read post]
26 May 2010, 4:12 am
[v] Mridual Chadha [vi] Press Information Bureau. [read post]
