Search for: "United States v. Burden" Results 7821 - 7840 of 9,848
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Feb 2019, 1:31 pm by Amy Howe
The state appealed to the Supreme Court, which announced in January that it would review the case, Lamone v. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 9:45 pm by Richard J. Pierce, Jr.
Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Hawaii v. [read post]
Or as Marshall put it in 1800: “[T]he people of the United States have no jurisdiction over offenses committed on board a foreign ship against a foreign nation. [read post]
18 May 2018, 6:21 am by Doug Cornelius
An April 2016 decision by the federal appeals court in Chicago in United States v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 1:49 pm by Greg Mersol
 Over 4,100 plaintiffs ultimately opted in from over 2,000 AT&T Mobility stores across the United States. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 5:31 am by Howard Wasserman
First, this case is going to be considered of a piece with last term's decision in United States v. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 1:18 pm
Prior to the decision in Daga Capital, there were a few decisions, specifically in the context of section 14A, stating that the burden was on the Revenue to show the link between the expenditure incurred and the tax-free income earned. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 6:00 am by Eugene Kontorovich
Or as Marshall put it in 1800: “[T]he people of the United States have no jurisdiction over offenses committed on board a foreign ship against a foreign nation. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 11:35 am by Jon Miller
Wiley won the case with the Second Circuit ruling that the first sale doctrine only applies to goods manufactured in the United States. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 10:00 am
To download a copy of the Appellate Division's decision, please use this link: Pelton v. 77 Park Avenue Condominium [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 11:53 am by Phil Dixon
Under Bruen, the government has the burden to establish modern regulation of firearms are consistent with h [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 9:30 pm by Michael S. Kang
But in the United States, we largely allow elected officials to decide district lines for themselves and their colleagues. [read post]
  First, Daniels mentions the United States Supreme Court’s (the “Supreme Court”) rulings in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 3:00 am by LindaMBeale
  Here's the background statement from TD 9564: The United States Supreme Court has recognized the highly factual nature of determining whether expenditures are for capital improvements or for ordinary repairs. [read post]