Search for: "Ex Parte Mays" Results 7841 - 7860 of 12,876
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jan 2013, 5:43 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Also, Court and Congress have numerous times affirmed that dual protection is a reality of the IP system: design patent and copyright protection may coexist, as may utility patent and copyright (computer programs). [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 5:41 am by Susan Brenner
At some point, he applied for a warrant to search a home at 145 Pleasant Avenue in Burlington and, in so doing, submitted an affidavit in support of the application that included, in part, the following statements: The crime was reported by a resident of New York. [read post]
5 Jan 2013, 10:32 am by Joel R. Brandes
After hearing the testimony from the petitioner and his investigators, the Court granted an ex parte application for an order directing the U.S. [read post]
4 Jan 2013, 5:48 am by Kenneth Anderson
Professor Kent will be guest-posting about the article, so the Readings post will be brief, but we wanted to flag this interesting and provocative analysis of Ex Parte Quirin. [read post]
4 Jan 2013, 4:40 am by John L. Welch
Because Otter provided no evidence of acquired distinctiveness, it could not prevail in this proceeding.The Board noted that a mark on the Supplemental Register may be cited as a basis for refusing registration to another mark under Section 2(d) because, in the ex parte context, the PTO does not and cannot question the validity of a registered mark that is cited against another mark under Section 2(d).In the inter partes context, however, the Otto Roth doctrine… [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 2:21 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
The appeal of ex parte re-exam 95/000,402 offers guidance to both the requestor and to the patent holder on "what NOT to do." [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 2:15 pm by Howard Knopf
Will there be interventions that may assist the Court in a  case involving an unusual fact situation that that could have far reaching results? [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 2:00 am by koherston
This article by Pamela Paul in the New York Times may be of interest to my readers. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 3:29 pm by Robert B. Milligan
By Robert Milligan and Joshua Salinas As part of our annual tradition, here is our list of the top 10 developments/headlines in trade secret, computer fraud, and non-compete law for 2012. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 3:29 pm by Robert B. Milligan
By Robert Milligan and Joshua Salinas As part of our annual tradition, here is our list of the top 10 developments/headlines in trade secret, computer fraud, and non-compete law for 2012. [read post]
28 Dec 2012, 1:57 pm by Bexis
  Courts and the common law are part of the government, and thus equally subject to First Amendment limits, as we discussed here. [read post]
28 Dec 2012, 12:29 am by Kevin LaCroix
Of course, it is possible that they may yet be further appeals in this case and so the final story may yet to be told. [read post]
27 Dec 2012, 7:42 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Siemens (Iselin, NJ) lost its appeal in Ex parte Ahmed. [read post]
27 Dec 2012, 7:38 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Cir. 2004); Ex parte Curry, 84 USPQ2d 1272, 1274 (Bd. [read post]
27 Dec 2012, 7:15 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Many cases are cited in the Board's affirmance in Ex parte Karr:If a prima facie case of obviousness is established, the burden shifts to the applicant to come forward with arguments and/or evidence to rebut the prima facie case. [read post]
27 Dec 2012, 7:09 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
The Board cited KSR in Ex parte Lim We also agree with the Examiner’s explicit motivation that combining the references would be obvious since all four references are of an “analogous art” of mobile communication terminals having image processing and multiple displays for displaying thumbnail images and other data (Ans. 8-9). [read post]
26 Dec 2012, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
As a rule, the Boards admit amendments when they are filed in response to objections or evidence that are not part of the impugned decision but have been submitted for the first time in the course of the appeal proceedings. [read post]