Search for: "Gooding v. United States" Results 7841 - 7860 of 21,084
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 May 2015, 2:29 pm by Schachtman
United States Restructured and Revitalized: A Proposal to Amend Federal Evidence Rule 702,” 26 Jurimetrics J. 249, 256 (1986)). [read post]
5 Dec 2014, 2:49 pm by David Faustman
CLS Transportation, the employer in the case, has filed a Petition for a Writ of Certiorari with the United States Supreme Court seeking review of that portion of the California decision dealing with PAGA. [read post]
16 May 2008, 4:15 am
Newcomer Barilla had become the highest selling brand of pasta in the United States by the early 2000s, which motivated Barilla to seek registration of the subject mark. [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 9:45 am by Michael Price, Faiza Patel
Here’s why:   The Muslim “Registry”—Korematsu Is Not “Good Law” In this scenario, Donald Trump orders (somehow) all Muslims inside the United States to “register” with the federal government. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 10:35 am by Florian Mueller
It has taken the Supreme Court of the United States less than two months since a mid-October hearing and less than ten pages (counting only the opinion per se, not the two-page syllabus) to determine and explain that the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit got the law on design patent damages fundamentally wrong. [read post]
5 Mar 2008, 6:38 am
Last week, the Court handed Riegel v Medtronic, 128 S. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 3:29 pm by Ken White
The Fifth Circuit is the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. [read post]
15 Oct 2008, 5:52 pm
  For the record, my opinions here track closely to my view of the convergence issue between the United States and Europe: too much deference to different theoretical priors without respectfully hashing out how those priors hold up to available evidence. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 4:19 pm by NL
The Court noted the High Court decision in R (Cala Homes (South) Ltd) v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2010] EWHC 2866 (Admin) that revocation of the plan by excecutive action was unlawful and also the Court of Appeal decision in R (Cala Homes (South) Ltd) v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2011] EWCA Civ 639 that the intended revocation of the regional plan was a material factor that planning authorities could… [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 4:19 pm by NL
The Court noted the High Court decision in R (Cala Homes (South) Ltd) v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2010] EWHC 2866 (Admin) that revocation of the plan by excecutive action was unlawful and also the Court of Appeal decision in R (Cala Homes (South) Ltd) v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2011] EWCA Civ 639 that the intended revocation of the regional plan was a material factor that planning authorities could… [read post]