Search for: "State v. Money"
Results 7841 - 7860
of 20,533
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Aug 2022, 12:40 pm
We need money, we need energy, we need practical support to get people the care they need. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 11:52 am
United States Department of Housing and Urban Development. [read post]
2 Aug 2007, 11:44 am
This may be the most important lesson of Blunt - preemption is important enough to take the time and spend the money to do it right. [read post]
20 Mar 2010, 11:22 pm
Marshall v. [read post]
2 Dec 2007, 12:08 pm
" McNally v. [read post]
7 Sep 2015, 8:26 am
According to a recent news article form the National Law Review, the California state legislature has just passed Assembly Bill 465 (AB 465), which prohibits the use of mandatory employment agreements by employers in the state. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 1:49 pm
Renee Unterman pushed for the new legislation and told The Atlanta Journal-Constitution that “the state is spending money to fight an opioid epidemic, and practitioners” are ignoring the work of the General Assembly and it makes Unterman believe “that [doctors] think they are held to a different standard. [read post]
4 May 2018, 5:35 am
In Walker v. [read post]
15 Nov 2021, 7:08 am
From Nevada Wildlife Alliance v. [read post]
26 Dec 2017, 5:19 pm
Likewise, the Kentucky Supreme Court held in Hill v. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 9:12 am
”Id. at 1141-42 (various citations omitted).Courts in other states following this general approach are: Haygood v. [read post]
11 May 2007, 2:18 pm
An interesting case from the Second Department Tuesday provides some answers - People v Taylor, 2007 NY Slip Op 04149. [read post]
30 Nov 2022, 4:30 am
Back in 2012, it was crystal clear (to me anyway) that Justice Kagan should recuse herself from the important Obama Care case NFIB v. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 7:31 am
It also finds that firms with patents are funded more often and for more money. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 7:59 am
Gosbee v. [read post]
10 May 2021, 3:06 pm
P.D.V-G., Appellant, v. [read post]
30 May 2018, 5:00 am
As we often observe, the name of the game in ADA defense is maximizing the money spent on permanent solutions and minimizing the money spent on lawyers. [read post]
10 Sep 2008, 12:07 am
"Sometimes people marry for money, and sometimes people kill for money. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 6:14 pm
The opinion is Tirado v. [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 10:00 pm
However, the Court of Appeals stated that the case of Bynum v. [read post]
