Search for: "United States v. Close" Results 7841 - 7860 of 14,200
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jul 2014, 7:35 pm
Plaintiff is a "national cable television network dedicated to reporting on legal and judicial systems of the United States, the 50 states, and the District of Columbia. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
  It’s not exact, but this eerily close for a coincidence. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:18 am by Rich McHugh
By Rich McHugh As we noted in a previous blog entry, the United States Supreme Court recently ruled in two companion cases, Sebelius v. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 10:40 am by nedaj
COLE-FRIEMAN & MALLON LLPwww.colefrieman.com July 10, 2014 FATCA Transitional Period. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 10:25 am by Scott Hervey
  JEW filed a complaint for declaratory relief in the United States District Court for the Central District of California, requesting the court to declare that the above mark does not infringe or dilute any of the DUKE trademarks owned by Duke University. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 10:11 am by Jeff Foust
“Some argue that it would take years to build a comparable engine here in the United States, and they talk about the cost of building those assets. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 5:17 am
People that closed on their condos years ago still have not had their punch lists completed. . . .3. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 4:36 am by Ben
 He is being held in a high security prison in Västervik, although he recently requested a transfer to a lower safety class unit. [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
Although the specifics of the case involved “closely-held” corporations, the majority’s logic obviously opens up the possibility—indeed the likelihood—that other large, for-profit corporations could declare themselves to be motivated by religious convictions. [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 6:09 am by Joy Waltemath
The lower court’s grant of summary judgment and a jury verdict in favor of his employer on his retaliation claims were affirmed, however (Abrams v Department of Public Safety, State of Connecticut, July 14, 2014, Wesley, R). [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
This criticism is closely related to similar complaints about the Court’s campaign finance rulings, especially Citizens United v. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 6:48 am by MBettman
On July 8, 2014, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in the case of State of Ohio v. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 6:22 am by Patrick Maines
But several years before Citizens United, the Court largely nullified a major section of its McCain-Feingold decision when it ruled, in FEC v. [read post]