Search for: "United States v. John" Results 7841 - 7860 of 11,600
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Dec 2007, 6:49 am
As new symptoms arise, the fable taught that lawmakers (or regulators) are justified in revisiting the diagnosis, unfettered by judicial interference or constitutional constraint.In the Supreme Court's 1957 majority opinion in United States v. [read post]
26 May 2020, 7:55 am by Dan Bressler
United States, in which the IRS used a ‘John Doe’ summons that sought the identity of clients for whom the law firm had performed certain work. [read post]
31 Jul 2007, 6:05 am
The brief addressing this question, a concept known as scheme liability, was filed in support of the investors in the Stoneridge case.The brief noted that the Solicitor General rejected the SEC's specific recommendation that the United States file an amicus brief in support of investors and urge the Court to follow the Commission's long-standing interpretation of the statutory and regulatory provisions at issue. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 10:03 pm
I am inclined to agree with John Cole's comments in The Blogger Coverage of Iran that the blogosphere's breathless endorsement of allegations of election fraud in Iran has been slightly overblown and, from a factual standpoint, a bit hard to swallow.Andrew Sullivan's Twitter v. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 5:30 pm by Colin O'Keefe
– Jackson, Mississippi attorney Philip Thomas on the blog Mississippi Litigation Review and Commentary Monday Morning Regulatory Review – 10/13/14: Hobby Lobby Implementation; Jumping the Gun on a Final Rule; Extended Waters of the United States; and EPA Rules to Watch – Washington, DC lawyer Lee Beck on his blog, the Federal Regulations Advisor For more of the best, check out LXBN, a complete review of the top insight and commentary across the LexBlog Network. [read post]
21 Nov 2014, 11:19 am by Laura (Program Assistant)
Maciej Lipinski A recent ruling in the United States has repercussions for a woman seeking refugee status in Canada. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 9:04 am by Corporate Action Network
This infamous moment in the United States’ “global war on terror” will forever remain an ugly scar on our nation’s legacy as a people that (allegedly) value human rights and protect human dignity. [read post]
16 Oct 2012, 9:34 am by Glenn
Having witnessed this same pas de deux for years in connection with United States v. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 1:03 am by Lawrence Solum
Here is the abstract: Students of the history of administrative law in the United States regard the antebellum era as one in which strict common law rules of official liability prevailed. [read post]
18 May 2012, 2:00 am by Keith Paul Bishop
Supreme Court says “no” to Bulldog In March, I wrote that the Bulldog group of funds had asked the United States Supreme Court to determine the constitutionality of Massachusetts’ ban general solicitations in connection with the offer and sale of unregistered securities. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 1:33 pm
John Seddon, an employee who worked as an operator technician for DuPont, reported numerous workplace safety concerns, and eventually filed a complaint with the United States Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). [read post]
10 Jul 2007, 9:25 am
Only the United States -- that is, the prosecution before a war crimes trial commission - may pursue pre-trial appeals. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 9:05 am by Ritika Singh
Orin Kerr writes in the Volokh Conspiracy about the Eleventh Circuit’s decision yesterday in United States v. [read post]