Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court" Results 7861 - 7880 of 9,094
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Mar 2012, 9:02 pm by Lyle Denniston
 Senior District Court Judge Roger Vinson of Pensacola, Fla. [read post]
10 Apr 2007, 10:15 am
” Those two words confine “the business of federal courts to questions presented in an adversary context and in a form historically viewed as capable of resolution through the judicial process. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 9:05 pm by Rachel Rebouche
Supreme Court handed down its decision in June Medical Services v. [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 3:23 am by Dennis Crouch
 However, the district court ruled on summary judgment (and before claim construction) that the claim was invalid as lacking patent eligiblity under Section 101. [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 12:54 pm by Bexis
  There've been a raft of good decisions, although none from the United States Supreme Court, for all us practitioners on the right (in more ways than one) side of the “v. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 12:55 pm by Eugene Volokh
The truth is that it will look almost the same as other determinations we ask district courts to make every day. [read post]
27 Apr 2019, 7:00 am by Jonathan Shaub
The individual does not have the authority to waive that privilege, and agency regulations, called Touhy regulations after the Supreme Court case Touhy v. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 4:30 pm by INFORRM
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York ruled that some of the works on the site were of “recognized stature” and that Wolkoff willfully violated VARA in destroying them. [read post]
The Court then reversed the district court’s denial of the State’s renewed JMOL motion on the Penn Central test as well. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 3:00 am by Ted Folkman
The governing authority in this case, as the District Court correctly held, comes not from this or any other circuit, but the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
17 Feb 2017, 8:50 am by Ken White
Third, the Supreme Court recently upended (or clarified, if you prefer) some First Amendment precedent in a case called Reed v. [read post]
24 Apr 2007, 3:41 pm
The District Court said the case was not moot. [read post]
6 May 2009, 9:55 am
  The court explained, "the Constitution does not condition our government's investigative powers on the practices of foreign legal regimes ‘quite different from that which obtains in this country.'" Third, relying on "guidance" from the Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]