Search for: "Study v. State"
Results 7861 - 7880
of 15,013
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Feb 2015, 9:11 am
That’s the conclusion of the United States Court of Appeals in upholding the FTC’s ruling. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 8:12 am
Camarero, both from the University Jaume I (Castellón) have addressed the ECtHR decision SAS v. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 4:00 am
Beydoun, Facing Mecca from Prison: Religious Accommodation of Muslim Prisoners Before Holt v. [read post]
8 Feb 2015, 4:23 pm
The United States Department of Justice has decided that the company will not face charges. [read post]
8 Feb 2015, 2:38 pm
Greenland is correct to call out expert witnesses, regardless of party of affiliation, who opine that inconclusive studies are “proof” of the null hypothesis. [read post]
8 Feb 2015, 2:30 pm
Greenland is correct to call out expert witnesses, regardless of party of affiliation, who opine that inconclusive studies are “proof” of the null hypothesis. [read post]
7 Feb 2015, 6:03 pm
In Commonwealth v. [read post]
7 Feb 2015, 11:28 am
Now, county isn't the best unit for this study. [read post]
7 Feb 2015, 9:18 am
The case of McNaughton v. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 2:02 pm
Supreme Court in Prince v. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 9:28 am
Renna v. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 6:54 pm
Supp. 2d 1345, 1367 (S.D.Fla.2011), aff’d, Chapman v. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 5:13 pm
This is all based on “Context-Dependent learning” or “State-dependent learning”. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 11:31 am
Supreme Court actually is about to decide a case (Elonis v. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 1:01 pm
In a 2012 decision from the Supreme Court of Canada, Dore v. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 8:59 am
POM Wonderful, LLC v. [read post]
1 Feb 2015, 6:01 pm
In Commonwealth v. [read post]
1 Feb 2015, 4:06 pm
Palmer used twitter to announce his plan to sue after the state election. [read post]
1 Feb 2015, 3:59 pm
Nor is Kanerva v. [read post]
1 Feb 2015, 4:00 am
LEXIS 9132 (MD TN, Jan. 27, 2015), a Tennessee federal district court permitted an inmate to move ahead with his complaint that authorities refused to provide a room for Hanafi Muslims to meet twice a week for study and prayer.In Payne v. [read post]
