Search for: "V. JACKSON" Results 7861 - 7880 of 9,315
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Aug 2023, 4:00 am by Unknown
The SEC’s response to the Chamber of Commerce’s petition for review of the Share Repurchase Disclosure Modernization rulemaking, whose timing coincided with the imposition of an excise tax on buybacks under the Inflation Reduction Act, at length seeks to refute the Chamber’s First Amendment claims, while also seeking to bolster the rigor of the agency’s economic analysis (Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America v. [read post]
17 Feb 2021, 9:10 am by Kate Ruane
v=111zsenxTcw&feature=youtu.beWe know of at least two more Black men who were misidentified and falsely arrested due to face recognition technology. [read post]
20 Nov 2010, 2:01 am by INFORRM
This can be a heavy burden, particularly where the charge is a grave one, but requiring defendants to prove truth is not incompatible with Article 10: see McVicar v UK (2002) 35 EHRR 22; Steel v UK [2005] EMLR 314. [read post]
20 Mar 2022, 5:36 pm by INFORRM
Events The Bonavero Institute, University of Oxford, is hosting an online lecture by Vicki C Jackson titled Knowledge Institutions in Constitutional Democracies: Reflections on “the Press” on 22 March 2022, 15:00-16:30. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 6:20 am by Eugene Volokh
It turns out, though, that there’s one such defensive use incident I originally missed, but that yielded a Georgia Supreme Court decision just a few weeks ago, in Hill v. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 5:16 am by Sherry F. Colb
ColbIn Justice Alito's (SA's) leaked opinion in Dobbs v. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 3:32 pm by Peter Margulies
Roberts cited Justice Robert Jackson’s dissent, which averred that the internment had “no place in law under the Constitution. [read post]
4 May 2023, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
 By Eric SegallTwenty years ago, Justice Sandra Day O'Connor wrote the following in Grutter v. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 11:46 am by Ted Max
 Justice Alito, on the other hand, questioned whether any reasonable consumer would assume the Bad Spaniels toy, even with its references to dog excrement, would have anything to do with Jack Daniels.[7] Justice Brown Jackson questioned whether the Rogers v. [read post]