Search for: "M J.1."
Results 7881 - 7900
of 9,076
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 May 2009, 9:57 am
However, it is not the optimal way to implement a statute.MemorandumDate: May 6, 2009To The CommissionFROM Robert J. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 4:45 am
The MOJO trade dress has a different color scheme, fonts, and number and placement of design elements; it’s embellished rather than minimalist; and it uses curves in the large curved “J” of MOJO, the cursive font used to describe the product-line, and the mountain displayed along the bottom of the packaging. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 8:06 am
Facilitating the freezing and recovery of assets;j. [read post]
13 Aug 2007, 1:26 am
Castilla, Música de Enrique J. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 10:06 am
State of Gujarat (1989)1 SCC 678 speaking for himself and other three learned Judges of the Constitution Bench through Oza, J., reiterated the same principle. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 3:30 pm
OppeheimerFunds with the most exposure include: Childrens Tr Fd P R Tob Asset Backed Bds-ser A 16876QBJ7 Puerto Rico Comwlth Pub Impt-ser A 7451455B4 Puerto Rico Comwlth Cap Apprec-ref-pub Impt 745145AT9 Puerto Rico Comwlth Cap Apprec-ref-pub Impt 745145AU6 Puerto Rico Comwlth Cap Apprec-ref-pub Impt 745145AW2 Puerto Rico Comwlth Ref-pub Impt 745145AX0 Puerto Rico Comwlth 745145EK4 Puerto Rico Comwlth Ref-pub Impt-ambac Tcrs 745145GB2 Puerto Rico Comwlth Pub Impt 745145HP0 Puerto Rico Comwlth Pub… [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 7:41 am
Trump Case No. 9:23-cr-80101 Charging instruments and Arraignment Superseding Indictment charging a third defendant, Carlos De Oliveira, with four counts, and adding three counts against Trump and two counts against Nauta (July 27, 2023) Indictment of Donald Trump and Waltine Nauta (June 8, 2023) Trump waiver of appearance at arraignment, and entry of not guilty plea (Aug. 4, 2023) Government notice of superseding indictment (July 27, 2023) Minute order for Nauta initial appearance and arraignment… [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 11:55 am
Mann, against National Review magazine, the Competitive Enterprise Institute, and Mark Steyn.[1] Back in 2014, I commented upon the oddity of a scientist’s claim of defamation against lay people for criticizing a scientist’s work.[2] Mann took umbrage to statements, critical of his work that generated a “hockey-stick” model of global temperature rises. [read post]
15 Sep 2013, 4:00 am
Can., 2000-04-13), 2000 CSC 18, SOQUIJ AZ-50071558, J.E. 2000-832, [2000] 1 R.C.S. 455, sont toujours applicables. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 4:00 am
I’m always skeptical of such broad claims. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 3:59 am
To that extent, the claimant’s case is clearly weaker than, or at least distinguishable from, that of the successful claimant in Lister [2002] 1 AC 215, or of a Roman Catholic boy, such as M, who worked as an altar server at the Church and was abused by Father Clonan. [read post]
20 May 2024, 6:26 am
In this section, I list some methodologies that (1) have been widely accepted, (2) can be implemented in a highly efficient manner, and (3) are highly informative for the initial economic assessment stage. [read post]
21 Sep 2017, 6:43 am
The Third Circuit noted that the district court had identified three grounds for excluding Campion’s statistical analyses: (1) Dr. [read post]
25 Jul 2024, 4:00 am
They also contrast sharply with the Supreme Court of Canada’s directives in R v Gladue, [1999] 1 SCR 688 and R v Ipeelee, 2012 SCC 13, which expects judges to consider systemic background factors at all stages of the criminal process. [read post]
25 Nov 2020, 5:47 am
Just like with a Level A1, a person can only get up to 60 days, oh, I’m sorry, just like with a Level One but not like a Level A1, a person under a Level Two sentence can only get 60 days of pretrial credit towards the 90 days of required continuous alcohol monitoring. [read post]
12 Jun 2010, 4:32 am
Si j’achète sera-t-il facile de louer? [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 4:40 am
J. [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 3:57 pm
§ 922(g)(1). [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 4:40 am
André, M. [read post]
26 Apr 2021, 7:04 am
Finally, some rational weaknesses of the Court’s reasoning are pointed out while sketching out a new approach to determining the fundamental purpose of Art. 24 No. 1 Brussels Ia-Regulation. [read post]
