Search for: "MATTER OF BROWN" Results 7881 - 7900 of 9,189
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jan 2010, 10:45 am by charonqc
  I would also like to wish you a Happy and, being lawyers, a prosperous New Year – although I do appreciate that some criminal and family law practitioners in England & Wales may start crying or laugh in a maniacal way on the matter of prosperity,  given the Ministry of Justice’s curious passion for reducing access to justice in our green, pleasant and sceptred land. [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 2:24 pm by scanner1
MARK ALAN BROWN, Defendant and Appellant. [read post]
30 Dec 2009, 9:08 pm
No matter what though, it is a great indicator of China's strong desire to increase its taxing powers, especially with respect to foreign companies. [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 8:53 pm by Victoria VanBuren
He graduated with his J.D. from the University of Michigan Law School in 1984 and his A.B. in Ancient Greek and Latin from Brown University in 1981. [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 11:28 am by ---------------------------------
"The decision by the Supreme Court now sends the matter back to the Eastern District of Michigan for trial. [read post]
26 Dec 2009, 12:26 pm by Dan Michaluk
From Brown J. of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice. 6. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 1:33 pm by Brian Y. Silber
The rapist is described as a white or light browned skinned man, tall and slim, in his 20's or 30's, with a clean shaven face. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 10:20 pm
(Yah, I know – ‘“please, please, please,” in the words of the immortal James Brown –  – hurry back! [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 1:42 pm by Sheppard Mullin
This article was originally posted on Sheppard Mullin's Corporate and Securities Law blog, which can be found at www.corporatesecuritieslawblog.com For further information, please contact Dan Brown at (212) 634-3095 or John Stigi at (213) 617-5589. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 11:28 am by Cal Law
Schwarzenegger and AG Jerry Brown's offices, who the court says have been lying to judges about why they've taken over a year to make arguments in a Medi-Cal fee matter. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 4:12 pm by NL
By the time the matters came to hearing the Claimant's grounds against Barnet were: First, it is submitted that in reaching the decision in question Barnet failed to fulfill its statutory duty under section 49A(1) of the [Disability Discrimination Act 1995] to have due regard to the six needs there set out, each of which identifies a particular goal the achievement of which would further the overall aim of the Act to eliminate discrimination and harassment of disabled persons and to… [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 4:12 pm by NL
By the time the matters came to hearing the Claimant's grounds against Barnet were: First, it is submitted that in reaching the decision in question Barnet failed to fulfill its statutory duty under section 49A(1) of the [Disability Discrimination Act 1995] to have due regard to the six needs there set out, each of which identifies a particular goal the achievement of which would further the overall aim of the Act to eliminate discrimination and harassment of disabled persons and to… [read post]