Search for: "Read v. United States" Results 7881 - 7900 of 30,082
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Nov 2019, 9:01 am by Jeffrey Mitchell
Targeted infrastructure funding is partly addressed by a Senate appropriations bill that devotes $690 million in fiscal year (FY) 2020 funding for the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Rural Utilities Service (RUS) broadband loan and grant programs (presumably including the ReConnect program). [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 5:48 am by Kluwer Patent blogger
Are the UPCA and the ratification laws compatible with the State’s duty to protect constitutional identity? [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 8:44 am by Elizabeth A. Patton
As predicted, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) has now extended its inquiry on the impact of artificial intelligence (“AI”) technologies to copyright, trademark, and other intellectual property rights. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 3:54 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Find all of the latest updates at narf.org/nill/bulletins/index.html State Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2019.htmlCayuga Nation v. [read post]
  However, the union claimed that decades of NLRB case law was unconstitutional and that its activity was protected as free speech under the First Amendment of the United States Constitution pursuant to Reed v. [read post]
30 Oct 2019, 2:13 pm by Forrest G. Read IV
Four thousand Liberian holders of Deferred Enforced Departure (DED) status and their roughly 4,000 U.S. citizen children may have to leave the United States because of the decision in African Communities Together v. [read post]
30 Oct 2019, 10:05 am by Ettinger Law Firm
In 2018, the United States District Court for the District of Alaska in the case of Disability Law Center of Alaska v. [read post]
30 Oct 2019, 3:47 am by Edith Roberts
At Vox (via How Appealing), Ian Millhiser argues that United States v. [read post]
When the President of the United States is tried, the Chief Justice shall preside: And no Person shall be convicted without the Concurrence of two thirds of the Members present. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 7:10 am by Aditi Shah
In the Jennings case, Alejandro Rodriguez, a Mexican citizen and lawful permanent resident in the United States, represented a class certified under Rule 23(b)(2). [read post]