Search for: "STATE v. SMALL" Results 7881 - 7900 of 16,894
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Sep 2015, 1:00 am by Ryan Dolby-Stevens, Olswang LLP
In the Court of Appeal, the court considered the development of the case law, especially the recent cases of Murray v Leisureplay Plc [2005] EWCA Civ 963 and El Makdessi v Cavendish Square Holdings BV [2013] EWCA Civ 1539, stating (per Lord Justice Moore-Bick at paragraph 21): “[T]he modern cases thus appear to accept that a clause providing for payment on a breach of a sum of money that exceeds the amount that a court would award as compensation…may not be… [read post]
12 Sep 2015, 10:08 pm by Patricia Salkin
Mireabella v Villard, 2015 WL 4886439 (ED PA 8/17/2015)Filed under: Current Caselaw, Retaliation, Section 1983 Liability [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 3:23 pm by Schachtman
It is not all about putting a DSM-V diagnosis on the chart, and prescribing medication. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 6:00 am by Dennis N. Brager
If you or your small business is facing a tax audit by the IRS or California state tax authorities, the stakes are too high to go it alone. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 1:24 am by The Law Office of Philip D. Cave
We understand the Coast Guard to be a small Service, see United States v. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 1:00 am by Adebayo Lanlokun, Olswang LLP
Lord Hodge, with whom Lord Carnwath agreed, provided a dissenting judgment and specifically addressed the issue of retrospective assessment, citing the general principle stated in W T Ramsey Ltd v Inland Revenue Comrs [1981] UKHL 1 that, despite the fact that legislation to counter tax avoidance as a matter of sound policy may involve provisions with retroactive effect, this does not negate the need for clear and positive words as to the retrospective effect of the legislation. [read post]
9 Sep 2015, 1:59 pm by Gina Reif Ilardi and Molly Masenga
Discussing this standard, the California Supreme Court, in Kwikset Corp. v. [read post]
9 Sep 2015, 12:54 pm by Lyle Denniston
United States –– legal duty of Department of Veterans Affairs to set aside contracts for veteran-owned small business firms Tuesday, November 10: Tyson Foods v. [read post]
9 Sep 2015, 6:53 am by Joy Waltemath
The pertinent Labor Department regulation defining “establishment” within the context of the EPA states that the word “refers to a distinct physical place of business rather than to an entire business or ‘enterprise’ which may include several separate places of business. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 5:08 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  First, in a July 8, 2015 decision in Acevedo v. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 4:22 pm by INFORRM
The article states that “Bogus anti-drug vigilante Robert McAuley is on a dissident republican death list“. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 10:29 am
Backpage moved to dismiss all claims on the grounds of the Section 230 immunity — arguing that the plaintiffs’ claims were all based on Backpage having published the advertisements and that Section 230 immunizes it from state law claims based on its role as “publisher. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 3:28 am by Peter Mahler
The facts in Shapiro v Ettenson, 2015 NY Slip Op 31670(U) [Sup Ct NY County Aug. 16, 2015], are fairly simple. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 1:52 pm by Cynthia L. Hackerott
Addressing the merits of the Title VII claim, the district court determined that his claim was controlled by the Supreme Court’s decisions in Johnson v Transportation Agency, Santa Clara County, California (480 U.S. 616 (1987)), and United Steelworkers of America, AFL-CIO-CLC v Weber (20 EPD ¶30,026 (1979). [read post]