Search for: "Sees v. Sees"
Results 7881 - 7900
of 122,002
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Aug 2021, 4:15 am
Followers of European trademark developments will be familiar with the Sky v SkyKick litigation, in which the UK courts and the Court of Justice of the EU have addressed questions concerning trademark invalidity (see IPWatchdog report here). [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 10:29 pm
See Hammer v. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 1:51 pm
(See prior posting.) [read post]
26 Jan 2021, 4:15 am
In Harvest Rock Church v. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 3:05 am
“In the recent decision in UK Coal Mining v IC, Nottinghamshire County Council & Veolia [2012] UKUT 212 AAC, the Upper Tribunal has dismissed an appeal concerned with section 43(2) of FOIA (commercial prejudice): the First-Tier Tribunal (decision EA/2010/0142, on which see our post here) had been entitled to find that only very limited redactions could be made to provisions from a PFI contract for a waste incinerator. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 4:15 am
" (See prior posting.) [read post]
3 Aug 2021, 4:10 am
(See prior posting.) [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 4:05 am
(See prior posting.) [read post]
16 May 2014, 4:10 am
In Latta v. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 4:10 am
(See prior posting.) [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 12:54 pm
" (See prior posting.) [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 9:00 am
United States v. [read post]
16 May 2019, 8:15 am
See Endo Pharms., Inc. v. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 4:20 am
(See prior posting.) [read post]
15 Sep 2021, 8:27 am
(See prior posting.) [read post]
21 Nov 2017, 4:05 am
(See prior posting.) [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 8:09 pm
(See prior posting.) [read post]
28 May 2015, 8:33 am
See Wahl v. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 6:40 pm
(See prior posting.) [read post]
5 Feb 2018, 3:00 am
Francis Pileggi recently blogged about a decision from late last year – HBMA Holdings v. [read post]
