Search for: "State v. Browning"
Results 7881 - 7900
of 8,738
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Mar 2016, 7:51 am
I was, along with Jim Charne, one of two industry lawyers involved on behalf of the IGDA with the IGDA/AAAS Amicus “Friend of the Court” Brief in support of the video game industry in the United States Supreme Court case, Brown vs EMA; the case that established for all time that video games are to be treated as art for all purposes. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 3:35 pm
Unlike Dobbs v. [read post]
31 Dec 2018, 7:00 am
Ross was also selected by Dennis Herrera, the San Francisco City Attorney, to handle Litvinova v. [read post]
30 Jul 2011, 10:29 pm
Gaines [Picked by Brendan V. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 7:55 am
Estate of Barbara Bobo v. [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 9:05 pm
In Sheetz v. [read post]
1 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm
Thus, new originalists typically argue that Brown v. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 5:25 am
(She does seem to think that Brown v. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 10:54 am
Brown v. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 5:38 am
Board of Regents of Univ. of Oklahoma—forced law school integration and formed the precedent used to dismantle school segregation in Brown v. [read post]
28 Feb 2010, 7:31 am
These delays have taken place in many of the recent privacy and confidence actions, for example, Lord Browne v Associated Newspapers, Napier v Pressdram, and Cream Holdings v Banerjee. [read post]
17 May 2022, 10:27 am
(In Carey v. [read post]
10 Sep 2015, 8:11 am
When our campuses and our country become more inclusive and integrated, we all benefit – an axiom that dates back to Brown v. [read post]
18 May 2022, 3:17 am
(In Carey v. [read post]
14 Apr 2009, 6:59 pm
A liberal is activist on issues where a minority was at risk of being treated unsympathetically by the majority (such as Brown v Board of Education, criminal rights, and the rights of political dissidents) or issues where pathways of democratic change were potentially being blocked (such as the reapportionment cases and the Pentagon Papers). [read post]
1 Jan 2022, 5:12 am
To use an example, did the Supreme Court’s decision in Brown v. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 4:47 pm
(emphasis added)Post-separation contributionsThe Full Court stated: It then becomes necessary to consider what happened subsequent to separation in mid-1997. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 8:10 am
The case is Gingery v. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 8:49 am
Second, the claims are ineligible for patent protection under the Supreme Court’s 2014 decision in Alice v. [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 9:42 pm
Ct. at 1012, "especially weighing the factor[] of time elapsed since the inception of the suit," Smoke v. [read post]
