Search for: "State v. C. S. S. B."
Results 7881 - 7900
of 15,316
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Dec 2014, 7:21 am
§101.60(c)(2)(v)). [read post]
19 Dec 2014, 5:12 am
The vehicle's registration, which was recovered during the search, revealed the car was registered to [Kennedy]'s mother at 573 Empire.Kennedy v. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 9:36 am
§ 1446(c)(2)(B), added to § 1446 as part of the Federal Courts Jurisdiction and Venue Act of 2011, it is only when either the plaintiff or the court questions a defendant’s assertion of the amount in controversy that evidence becomes an issue. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 7:22 am
State v. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 6:00 am
B. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 12:34 am
Given this is the second year we’ve compiled a list of year-end predictions – from legal professionals across the industry – we were struck by one underlying theme: it seems to us that overall this year’s predictions do seem more upbeat than last year’s predictions. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 12:38 pm
” 131 S. [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 1:56 pm
The 21-day safe harbor provision in Rule 11(c)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedures states in relevant part: A motion for sanctions must be made separately from any other motion and must describe the specific conduct that allegedly violates Rule 11(b). [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 12:57 pm
In Design Basics, LLC. v. [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 11:57 am
Evidence establishing the amount is required by § 1446(c)(2)(B) only when the plaintiff contests, or the court questions, the defendant’s allegation. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 2:48 pm
Submit=Display&Path=Y2013/D08-21/C:12-1349:J:Tinder:aut:T:fnOp:N:1190505:S:0). [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 2:38 pm
What the UT said was "a number of case sensitive factors will need to be considered including (a) size, configuration and overall dimensions, (b) access, (c) natural and electric lighting, (d) ventilation, and (e) privacy. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 12:43 pm
Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(b)(4)(B) and (C). [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 7:14 am
Minassian v. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 6:00 am
Moore v. [read post]
14 Dec 2014, 9:52 am
The Supreme Court’s decision this week in R. v. [read post]
13 Dec 2014, 6:31 pm
While the NYSBA states that the initial eligibility determinations shall be decided by the court (see id. standard C-3 at 6), they also declare that the "[p]rovision of counsel shall not be delayed while a person's eligibility...is being determined or verified" (id. standard C-5). [read post]
13 Dec 2014, 11:13 am
Code § 1252.102, and the Ninth Circuit’s decision in Miller v. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 5:06 am
In fact, third parties will only make this compound because they will be copying my client’s work once their product becomes successful. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 6:27 pm
According to the INA Section 203(b) states, in pertinent part, that: (1) Priority workers – visas shall first be made available… to qualified immigrants who are aliens described in any of the following sub-paragraphs (A) through (C): (A) Aliens with extraordinary – an alien is described in this sub-paragraph if- (i) The alien has extraordinary ability in the sciences, arts, education, business, or athletes which has been demonstrated by… [read post]
