Search for: "United States v. California"
Results 7881 - 7900
of 13,840
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Oct 2013, 10:19 am
Corcino & Associates et al., CV 13-3728 GAF (JCx), United States District Court Central District (October 7, 2013). [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 10:00 am
Although the Court relied exclusively on other district court decisions with regard to its injury in fact ruling, the outcome here is consistent with the United States Supreme Court’s recent decision in Clapper v. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 4:46 am
United States, in which the Court will consider whether criminal defendants whose assets have been frozen have a right to a pretrial hearing to challenge the basis for the charges against them so that they can use the assets to hire their counsel of choice. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 4:39 am
As it also explains, most state courts in the United States are courts of “general” jurisdiction, which means they can hear “any case over which no other tribunal has exclusive jurisdiction. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 9:01 pm
The Court specifically held in United States v. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 8:21 pm
” In its brief on the merits, the United States starts by reiterating that, under the Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 1:25 pm
United States v. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 6:35 am
United States (12-1493). [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 5:32 am
” Other previews come from Jess Bravin and Douglas Belkin in The Wall Street Journal and Vinay Harpalani at ISCOTUSnow, while in the San Jose Mercury News Howard Mintz discusses what the case might mean for California’s Proposition 209, that state’s seventeen-year-old ban on affirmative action. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 9:50 pm
Ocean Tomo, LLC v. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 12:18 pm
Following the US Supreme Court's decision in United States v. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 11:33 am
On September 20, 2013, Counsyl, Inc. filed a declaratory judgment complaint in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California against Myriad Genetics, Inc. [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 9:07 pm
In the case of Daimler/Chrysler AG v. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 6:44 pm
* * * “In Furman v. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 11:14 am
United States v. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 7:57 am
Post Submitted by Kirsten Hotchkiss, US Coordinator, Labor Law Plus™ Since the recent United States Supreme Court decision in Italian Colors v. [read post]
8 Oct 2013, 9:01 pm
In People v. [read post]
8 Oct 2013, 2:52 pm
Cir. 2010), in which this court construed “‘the centrifugal unit’” to be the entire unit. [read post]
8 Oct 2013, 9:11 am
EDT BakerHostetler's National Employment Class Action team will address recent class action decisions and how they are impacting businesses around the United States. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 8:34 pm
Procedural HistoryAfter a trial and post-trial motions, the United States District Court for the Central District of California de- termined that Emulex Corporation (Emulex) infringed Broadcom Corporation’s (Broadcom) U.S. [read post]
