Search for: "United States v. Mark" Results 7881 - 7900 of 10,394
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Apr 2011, 11:48 pm
Geoffrey Lin (Hogan Lovells) described his personal involvement with the Chint v. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 8:09 am by admin
.], the board filed a 237-page response in State Supreme Court that denied Mr. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 9:51 am by Steve Vladeck
United States and Printz are examples of the former, where Congress is injuring states directly by commandeering their legislative/executive policy. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 6:50 am by Gritsforbreakfast
  In 2004, the United States Supreme Court answered this question in the case of Hiibel v. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 5:10 am by Marie Louise
Murray (IP finance) United States US Patent Reform America Invents Act: First to Invent v. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 4:59 am by Matthew Flinn
Mark Revill and an accomplice attempted to break into a brick shed owned by Mr. [read post]
2 Apr 2011, 11:58 pm
Similarly, in United States v. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 7:40 am
One -- at the crack of dawn on Monday morning -- is a chance to share a breakfast with the early-rising Head of the United States Patent and Trademark Office, David Kappos (details here). [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 3:24 am by Marie Louise
liable for contributory infringement, ordered to remove links to infringing websites (1709 Blog) (IPKat) (1709 Blog) Netherlands Dutch Sony seizure dispute: a case for New Amsterdam (IPKat) South Africa Google test pilots its Innovation Incubator program in SA (Spicy IP) Sweden Pirate Bay back up, Pirate Party shut themselves down over server ‘abuse’ (TorrentFreak) United States US General Where’s EFF? [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 7:43 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
The treaty was ratified by the President of the United States on February 21, 1934. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 3:32 am by John L. Welch
TTABlog Tweets and Re-TweetsTTAB Posts January 2011 Hearing Schedule7th Circuit Rules That Sovereign Immunity Shields State from TM Infringement Counterclaim in Action for Review of TTAB DecisionText ©John L. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 10:11 pm by Maysa Razavi
It is officially part of the United States, but it isn’t really a state. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 5:00 am by Bexis
§337(a), which states:“[A]ll such proceedings for the enforcement, or to restrain violations, of this chapter [the entire FDCA] shall be by and in the name of the United States. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 12:59 pm by Aaron Pelley
Sandoval: The Court found that in light of the United States Supreme Court decision in Padilla v. [read post]