Search for: "Beare v. State"
Results 7901 - 7920
of 15,040
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jun 2014, 5:34 am
Under common law a mark is protectable through its use, or as was stated by Justice Pitney in United Drug Co v Theodore Rectans Co: "...the right to a particular mark grows out of its use, not its mere adoption; its function is simply to designate the goods as the product of a particular trader and to protect his good will against the sale of another's product as his". [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 1:00 pm
Instead the Court simply followed its ruling in Bilski v. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 11:53 am
As Ruthann Robson explains in her analysis for this blog, in its decision in Lane v. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 7:40 am
But NLRB v. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 1:41 am
I hear on the grapevine that the UKSC will be looking at this question shortly in Samin v Westminster CC and Mirga v SSWP. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 10:02 pm
Hearn cites a 1997 Supreme Court case (Old Chief v. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 6:06 pm
The website stated that the suffix “ov” is common to Russian surnames and evokes the Russian language. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 3:42 pm
In Lane v. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 10:00 am
In Blackhorse v. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 8:49 am
’” In examining the issue, the court specifically stated that “[t]he case of Finger v. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 8:11 am
In Commonwealth v. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 6:09 am
In their landmark 2008 case, District of Columbia v. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 2:09 am
*A lesser enterprise than Louis Vuitton might have heaved a sigh of relief and concentrated its energies in the manufacture of lock-bearing underwear, socks and pyjamas. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 5:08 pm
Does that mean it had obligations before it had notice (bearing in mind that the “no general obligation to monitor” protection of Article 15 of the E-Commerce Directive does not apply)? [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 11:40 am
By Rich McHugh The United State Supreme Court issued an opinion on June 12, 2014 in Clark v. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 5:00 am
The plaintiffs in Genereux v. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 1:50 pm
A food and drink label can be deemed false or misleading if: its labeling is false or misleading; information required is not prominently displayed on the label; or a label does not bear the common or usual name of the food. 21 U.S.C. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 12:50 pm
I've taught the Watergate Tapes case — United States v. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 9:58 am
Beach v. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 8:54 am
In Commonwealth v. [read post]
