Search for: "Davis v. Davis"
Results 7901 - 7920
of 8,261
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jan 2018, 9:01 pm
In Davis v. [read post]
25 Apr 2020, 6:54 pm
” Davis v. [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 2:41 am
As a consequence, courts were urged to develop the notion of frustration of the contract, which allows for termination of an agreement when the circumstances are “in a fundamental respect different from those which were envisaged”.6)In the definition of Davis Contractos Ltd. v. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 5:54 pm
Davis of Davis & Campbell in Peoria, Ill. [read post]
17 Nov 2022, 4:00 am
EPA and more in the concerns animating Justice Jackson’s concurrence in Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 6:05 am
Former President Donald Trump has promised voters that, if re-elected, he would “immediately” invoke the Alien Enemies Act to effect mass deportations of non-citizens from Mexico. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 6:44 am
Davis, 531 U.S. 230, 241 (2001); see also Lexecon Inc. v. [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 1:09 pm
And even if viewed as a regulation of purely commercial speech – and therefore not subject to strict scrutiny – the restriction would at least have to pass muster under the Supreme Court’s test in Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 8:26 am
Bivins v. [read post]
14 Jul 2012, 7:08 am
United States v. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
(IPKat) EU favours disclosure of computer patents before standards are set (Intellectual Property Watch) Trade Marks Court of First Instance finds RAUTARUUKKI fails to satisfy acquired distinctiveness criterion: Rautaruukki Oyj v OHIM (Class 46) Court of First Instance finds original signature of famous Italian lutist Antonio Stradivari, in arte Stradivarius, of the 17th century, cannot be read by relevant consumers: T‑340/06 (Catch Us If You Can!!!) [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 12:09 pm
Since 1663, the Royal Society has sported the motto: “Nullius in verba,” on no one’s authority. [read post]
25 Jun 2022, 4:02 am
Jennifer Davis: market for brands is huge and ongoing. [read post]
4 Aug 2018, 8:18 pm
Demonstrate deep familiarity with the jurisprudence of the Free Exercise Clause in the following respects:(A) Difference in meaning of the term Religion for Free Exercise Clause;(B) Early cases; (C) Traditional compelling Interest Test and its development; (D) The transformation of the traditional Approach (Employment Div. v. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 9:23 am
(2) Nike v. [read post]
30 Apr 2016, 3:28 pm
That’s Washington v. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 6:05 am
DoD’s Law of War Manual, § 15.4.2; the current availability of which is contested, see Bothe ¶ 28; Davis). [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 12:00 am
The only available guidance derives from DPP v Collins ([2006] UKHL 40), an appeal from the Divisional Court. [read post]
22 Aug 2010, 9:20 pm
(77) Malcom Floyd: If V-Jax ends up on a 10 game hold out or being traded to Seattle, Floyd becomes Rivers # 1 WR. [read post]
13 Mar 2019, 9:01 pm
The answer is yes, and the Supreme Court effectively made that clear four years ago in its important ruling in Arizona Legislature v. [read post]
