Search for: "Does 1 - 30"
Results 7901 - 7920
of 28,656
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Aug 2017, 10:21 am
See FTC Staff Summary 605(a)(1), Item 3. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 2:03 am
US Department of Labor, Case 1:21-cv-01106-RP (W.D. [read post]
26 Mar 2021, 6:41 am
An employer may mandate a nontraditional tip pool that includes tipped employees (e.g., servers) and non-tipped employees (e.g., cooks), provided that (1) the pool does not include any employers, managers or supervisors and (2) the employer does not pay the tipped employees using a tip credit but instead pays them the full minimum wage without applying any tip credit. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 7:10 am
The Michigan appeals court disagreed, finding that the UETA does not require a showing of the efficacy of security procedures in order to establish the validity of an electronic signature. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 7:46 am
On November 2, 2021, from 2:30 p.m. to 3:30 p.m. [read post]
14 Mar 2019, 12:35 pm
§ 7102(a)(1) (emphasis added). 4 42 Pa.C.S.A. [read post]
25 May 2015, 5:02 am
Defendants had mistaken September 30 as the scheduled move-out and inspection date.On September 30, around 10:30 a.m., Defendants arrived at the apartment intending to clean the unit and finish removing their belongings. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 10:54 am
Patent System October 30, 2023 | By: Mark Magas and Robert Greenspoon A bipartisan group of senators introduced two new bills this year to address prevailing issues with the U.S. patent system. [read post]
8 May 2022, 9:05 pm
Figure 1 Figure 1 also shows that GPs are more likely to report when LPs report good performance. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 8:20 pm
Does this mean a better outcome for litigants? [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 2:08 am
PwC’s April 1. 2010 press release about its 2010 study can be found here.? [read post]
31 Mar 2023, 4:26 pm
Properly read, Article 5.14(a) does not survive strict or intermediate scrutiny…. [read post]
7 May 2020, 3:43 pm
Question #44 could have indicated that it was intended to override or clarify Part 2(a) of the First Interim Rule, Question #3 and Question #33, but instead it is silent on that point.[4] Instead, Question #44 (released a month after the First Interim Final Rule and Question #3) injects uncertainty into the affiliation analysis by stating that the applicant “must count all of its employees and the employees of its U.S. and foreign affiliates” – does Question… [read post]
22 May 2017, 7:26 am
A court may compel arbitration of a federal statutory claim when (1) the arbitration provision clearly and unmistakably waives the employees’ ability to vindicate the federal statutory right in court; and (2) the federal statute does not exclude arbitration as an appropriate forum. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 2:20 pm
How does the prosecution know that the defendant was eliminating at that rate (assuming he was eliminating rather than absorbing) and not at .005% or .30%? [read post]
20 Sep 2017, 8:34 am
This means that you must begin the action as soon as possible to ensure it does not go to probate. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 7:42 am
Here’s the precise request from the proposed tariff published in the Canada Gazette:(e) for digital audio recorders, $5 for each recorder with no more than 1 Gigabyte (GB) of memory, $25 for each recorder with more than 1 GB and no more than 10 GB of memory, $50 for each recorder with more than 10 GB and no more than 30 GB of memory, and $75 for each recorder with more than 30 GB of memory. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 4:45 am
And about another circumstance in which you can lose the protection of the automatic stay 30 days after your case is filed. [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 4:01 am
"For example, Section 30(1)(e) of the Public Officers Law provides that a public officer, such as a police officer, automatically vacates his or her position if he or she is convicted of a felony or a crime involving a violation of the individual's oath of office. [read post]
19 Aug 2009, 11:29 am
” Order at 11 citing 30 V.S.A. [read post]
