Search for: "English v. English" Results 7901 - 7920 of 9,870
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 May 2017, 4:32 am by Guest Blogger
While they once followed English common law, federal courts today apply a familiar collection of discretionary doctrines that often result in the denial of remedies to the victims of government wrongdoing. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 3:29 am
[Merpel wonders about the difference between "sashimi slicing" and the more common English idiom "salami slicing", do readers have any insights?] [read post]
13 Feb 2015, 1:21 pm
  I don’t think there’s any incompatibility between this position and the position taken by the Supreme Court in Michigan v. [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 11:38 am by Giles Peaker
YR, R (On the Application Of) v London Borough of Lambeth (2022) EWHC 2813 (Admin) Ms YR had applied to Lambeth as homeless. [read post]
8 Apr 2009, 10:21 am
Samir Megahed (who I assume is Youssef's father) signed "English and Arabic consent forms (Forms FD-26 and FD-26.1)" allowing them to search. [read post]
23 Oct 2006, 3:43 am by Tobias Thienel
United Kingdom, at para. 36), whereas conversely, the inability of the police to commit a certain tort in English law (as a point of substantive law) is often described as an ‘immunity’ (see for criticism of this terminology Barrett v. [read post]
21 Jun 2009, 10:00 pm
(China Law Blog) Europe ECJ issues preliminary ruling in L’Oreal/Bellure regarding whether imitation perfumes were protected as permissible comparative advertising (Class 46) (IPKat) CFI: Proof of trade mark use: Harwin International LLC v OHIM, Cuadrado SA (IPKat) CFI: Last minute reprieve for passing off: Last Minute Network v OHIM-Last Minute Tour (IPKat) CFI dismisses Korsch’s appeal against refusal to grant CTM for ‘PharmaResearch’ due… [read post]
2 Apr 2017, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
’ India A comment piece in the Hoot has questioned what recourses ordinary people have when they are libelled by some of the country’s biggest newspapers, after a story published in a number of national English language newspapers. [read post]
19 May 2010, 11:13 pm by war
The sale in England by the English manufacturer to retailers for resale in Estex was sufficient for this, but awareness that the retail markets in Australia was the intended destination was not necessary. [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 12:57 am by Abacus IP
v=EDVluzisEI4 ARISE+ IPR - Geographical indications (GIs) - Koh Trung Pomelo https://www.youtube.com/watch? [read post]
18 Mar 2012, 4:49 am
The IPKat thinks that these proceedings sound similar to that in the old English decision of Maxims Ltd v Dye [1977] 1 WLR 1155 (Ch). [read post]