Search for: "J. C." Results 7901 - 7920 of 19,483
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 May 2015, 9:14 pm by Douglas Marques
É o chamado direito de arrependimento, garantido pelo artigo 49 do Código de Defesa do Consumidor (CDC). [read post]
13 May 2015, 7:14 am by INFORRM
The challenge to the provision was mounted on behalf of internet intermediaries solely by the Internet and Mobile Association of India (IAMAI) in W.P(C). 758/2014 in the same batch of IT Writ Petitions. [read post]
13 May 2015, 4:37 am
  The Court of Appeal (through Sir John Mummery) essentially agreed with Arnold J. and dismissed the appeal. [read post]
13 May 2015, 2:09 am by Giles Peaker
And so, to some extent, it proved to be in these joined appeals, where the issue was the meaning of vulnerability in s.189(1)(c) Housing Act 1996. [read post]
12 May 2015, 4:42 pm
But proving this specific factual assertion (and proving, by clear and convincing evidence, that defendants knew this assertion was likely false) would be very hard. c. [read post]
12 May 2015, 1:10 pm
What happens if the whistleblower complaint relates to matters other than Section 4(1)(d), (e) and (j)? [read post]
12 May 2015, 1:53 am
…"White & MacKay appealed, arguing that the hearing officer had not applied the principle of Case C-120/04 Medion AG v Thomson multimedia Sales Germany & Austria GmbH with regard to whether the earlier mark had an independent significant role in the later applicant's mark; that he had failed to establish the proper level of distinctive character of the respective marks; that he had failed to compare them properly and that he had wrongly assessed the likelihood… [read post]
11 May 2015, 11:01 pm
Imagine you’re flying from the United States to a foreign country and you’re carrying a laptop. [read post]
11 May 2015, 5:20 am
It is also contradicted by his own answers about deleting email messages containing `off-color’ material, J. . . which show that he understood Mr. [read post]
7 May 2015, 11:31 am by Schachtman
Climate scientists, at least those scientists who believe that climate change is both real and an existential threat to human civilization, have invoked their consensus as an evidentiary ground for political action. [read post]