Search for: "Liable Defendant(s)"
Results 7901 - 7920
of 21,109
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Oct 2017, 10:03 pm
In August, a jury in Los Angeles found Johnson & Johnson (one of largest companies and most famous names in over the counter health products,) liable for a woman’s ovarian cancer. [read post]
13 Oct 2017, 3:23 am
Let’s take a brief look at how it works. [read post]
13 Oct 2017, 3:01 am
In the ordinary employment context, an employer is strictly (automatically) liable if a supervisor or manager engages in this type of harassment. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 4:51 pm
Fortunately, the Court of Appeals for the First Circuit agreed that Ripoff Report is not liable. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 2:19 pm
Except in civil commitment actions brought pursuant to R. 4:74-7 and in actions in probate, foreclosure and all other general equity actions, a Case Information Statement in the form prescribed by Appendix XII to these rules shall be annexed as a cover sheet to each party's first pleading. (2) Notice of Other Actions and Potentially Liable Persons. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 12:12 pm
Here, the complaint alleges that Harley Davidson should be held strictly liable for a manufacturing defect, as the oil clamps were in a flawed condition when it left the manufacturer’s control. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 6:36 am
So for example, if plaintiff is deemed 70 percent at-fault and defendant is 30 percent at-fault, defendant would only be liable for 30 percent of plaintiff’s damages. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 12:01 pm
In making that determination, the justices added, courts should also consider “the practical consequences of” allowing a claim to go forward, along with whether international law would allow a particular defendant to be held liable for violating it. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 8:08 am
Defendant, meanwhile, denies it placed the tires where family alleged. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 8:00 am
This test balances the difficulty of proving causation in mesothelioma cases and the defendant’s right not to be held liable based on mere guesswork.) [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 4:16 am
It’s not easy. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 4:15 am
” Plaintiff alleges that defendant Stephen P. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 4:01 am
" The Appellate Division rejected Jones' contention that the CBA provides for indemnification of employees from judgments and settlements of claims arising from actions taken within the scope of such employees' public employment and duties and opined "a CBA is not a local law*** and, in any event, the language of the CBA here does not expressly provide that defendant will assume responsibility for the tortious acts of its Sheriff's deputies. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 9:23 am
However, the court rejected the plaintiff’s argument, stating that it would lead to an absurd result in that a property owner could only be held liable for a rollerblader’s injuries if that person was rollerblading in an area where he was not permitted to do so. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 5:52 am
This positioning by Google has left numerous persons no choice but to sue the planet’s most deep pocket, litigious, defender of the right to disseminate or re-disseminate whatever it wishes to regardless of the harm caused to others. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 5:12 am
The Second Circuit affirmed dismissal on the basis that corporations may not be held liable under the ATS, and the Supreme Court granted cert on this question. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 2:58 am
Because one day, he or she may be forced to pay attorney’s fees quantified in the manner ordained by this Court’s precedent, whether or not they ever sought [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 4:37 pm
In Leidos, the plaintiffs allege that the defendants should be liable for failing to disclose a significant contingent liability of which the company allegedly was aware. [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 12:27 pm
The defendants filed a motion for summary judgment, making several arguments as to why they could not be held legally liable for the plaintiff’s injuries. [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 11:15 am
The former - where a party expends attorney's fees to determine the existence of an indemnification obligation - is distinguished from the latter - where a party expends attorney's fees to defend itself from a third party claim which was the obligation of the other party to defend. [read post]
