Search for: "MATTER OF C A"
Results 7901 - 7920
of 36,786
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Aug 2013, 5:20 am
(e)(1); In re Jack C., III (2011) 192 Cal.App.4th 967, 978.) [read post]
10 Mar 2009, 1:22 pm
f=/c/a/2009/03/07/BAHJ16BE8V.DTL [read post]
23 Aug 2007, 6:36 am
§ 553(c)Promulgating rules that are arbitrary, capricious, contrary to law, in violation of the plaintiff's constitutional rights, and in excess of the USPTO's statutory jurisdiction and authority Violating Article 1, Section 8, clause 8 of the Constitution and the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment.More detail of the complaint after the jump. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 5:46 am
On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the trial court erred when it determined that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction to hear his appeal because he failed to file his appeal before the expiration of the forty-five day period pursuant to General Statutes § 4-183 (c). [read post]
6 Nov 2019, 7:39 am
Discuss the matter with a colleague or an experienced ethics lawyer. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 1:36 pm
Daniel Margolin and C. [read post]
2 Jul 2007, 4:59 am
According to the IPR Helpdesk, although Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 establishes an exclusive competence in matters related to validity and registration of IP rights, a dispute related to an IPR contract will seldom concern this issue as the main object of proceedings. [read post]
27 May 2010, 8:04 am
On Monday and Tuesday, he was in Beijing, for the Strategic and Economic Dialogue, with absolutely every financial regulator from the States that matters (Bernanke, Bair, Gensler, &c), where basically, he had to sit in a room and listen to speeches about the need for closer ties between China and the rest of the world. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 12:52 pm
The privilege was asserted by a documentary filmmaker in 2009 to protect unpublished interviews and raw video footage sought in a property litigation matter, Brescia v. [read post]
13 Jan 2017, 8:10 pm
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau 16-673 Issues: (1) Whether a federal official may retroactively ratify an ultra vires government action when: (a) no federal official was authorized to perform the act at the time it was initially undertaken; (b) the purported ratification does not include an examination of any facts related to the act performed; or (c) the ratification purports to encompass not only the initial act but also federal court rulings entered in response to the act; and… [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 6:03 am
[Kansas City Star]* Nebraska Law graduate and former Paul, Weiss partner Theodore C. [read post]
25 May 2011, 4:15 am
The measure specifically excludes any exception based on belief that circumcision "is required as a matter of custom or ritual. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 6:45 am
And second, interest rates only matter for revolvers (including sloppy payees). [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 4:51 am
" The First rejects this saying Congress can do whatever it wants in immigration matters. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 7:50 am
The elder also tested positive for C diff a horrible and painful infection which killed eighteen other residents. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 10:01 am
Wohlforth, A matter of honorJames D. [read post]
17 Mar 2012, 6:34 am
And, it was common practice back then, and I think you’re justifying the practice, that the examiners very frequently would say ‘Well the claim is rejected A in view of B and C — with respect to the last element, that’s a matter of mere design choice of no patentable consequence. [read post]
If the judge fails to make findings to support an award of counsel fees, the award must be set aside
4 Apr 2011, 2:49 pm
R. 5:3-5(c); Williams v. [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 12:22 pm
While the Commission used a "merit and fitness test," sometimes called an "unassembled examination," to determine civil service promotions to these titles (see Civil Service Law §52[2]), the Appellate Division said that it has not shown it would be impracticable to use the "competitive examination" procedures for this purpose.Therefore, said the court, the Commission's tests for these titles are not the equivalent of the "examinations for… [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 4:00 am
As a purely linguistic matter, § 636(c)(1)’s reference to the consent of “the parties” could be read to encompass both the named plaintiffs and the absent class members, for the term does not have a single fixed meaning. [read post]
