Search for: "State of California v. United States"
Results 7901 - 7920
of 13,843
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Oct 2013, 6:35 am
United States (12-1493). [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 5:32 am
” Other previews come from Jess Bravin and Douglas Belkin in The Wall Street Journal and Vinay Harpalani at ISCOTUSnow, while in the San Jose Mercury News Howard Mintz discusses what the case might mean for California’s Proposition 209, that state’s seventeen-year-old ban on affirmative action. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 9:50 pm
Ocean Tomo, LLC v. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 12:18 pm
Following the US Supreme Court's decision in United States v. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 11:33 am
On September 20, 2013, Counsyl, Inc. filed a declaratory judgment complaint in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California against Myriad Genetics, Inc. [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 9:07 pm
In the case of Daimler/Chrysler AG v. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 6:44 pm
* * * “In Furman v. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 11:14 am
United States v. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 7:57 am
Post Submitted by Kirsten Hotchkiss, US Coordinator, Labor Law Plus™ Since the recent United States Supreme Court decision in Italian Colors v. [read post]
8 Oct 2013, 9:01 pm
In People v. [read post]
8 Oct 2013, 2:52 pm
Cir. 2010), in which this court construed “‘the centrifugal unit’” to be the entire unit. [read post]
8 Oct 2013, 9:11 am
EDT BakerHostetler's National Employment Class Action team will address recent class action decisions and how they are impacting businesses around the United States. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 8:34 pm
Procedural HistoryAfter a trial and post-trial motions, the United States District Court for the Central District of California de- termined that Emulex Corporation (Emulex) infringed Broadcom Corporation’s (Broadcom) U.S. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 8:07 pm
California is second with 352. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 2:39 pm
For example, Lee cites Justice Grier's dissent in O'Reilly v. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 1:30 pm
By the time the year was over, thirty-eight Dakota men had been hanged in the largest mass execution in United States history. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 11:06 am
EmulexAfter a trial and post-trial motions, the United States District Court for the Central District of California de- termined that Emulex Corporation (Emulex) infringed Broadcom Corporation’s (Broadcom) U.S. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 11:06 am
By Lauren Liebes The recent United States Supreme Court ruling in United States v. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 5:03 am
By the time the year was over, thirty-eight Dakota men had been hanged in the largest mass execution in United States history. [read post]
6 Oct 2013, 2:18 pm
Respondent filed a Motion for Dismissal in which she stated that she was not served with the Petition until September 4, 2013, and that she and the children left the state of Nevada on August 27, 2013, and left the United States on August 31, 2013. [read post]
