Search for: "T A V Holdings Inc" Results 7901 - 7920 of 12,086
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Apr 2012, 1:10 pm by Michelle Yeary
  For example, they dismiss the holding in Dvora v. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 11:36 am by Greg May
If someone were actually trying to get tagged for many thousands of dollars for filing a frivolous appeal, they could learn a lot from Personal Court Reporters, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 10:16 am by James L. Higgins
The Court, citing then-Magistrate Judge Burke’s recent report and recommendation in Wyeth Holdings Corp. v. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 3:04 am by INFORRM
Following a meeting between the charity and the Sun, the newspaper accepted “notwithstanding the right of its columnist to hold a view that others strongly opposed” …. “that parts of the column had overstepped the mark and apologised for the offence caused” and will undergo training in reporting suicide. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 3:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
Plants, Inc., 9 NY2d 595, 599 [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Muzak Corp. v Hotel Taft Corp., 1 NY2d 42, 46-47).  [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 3:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
Plants, Inc., 9 NY2d 595, 599 [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Muzak Corp. v Hotel Taft Corp., 1 NY2d 42, 46-47). [read post]
21 Apr 2012, 5:06 pm by INFORRM
The decision not to allow Cox to use the shield law, and to deny her the chance to use a higher negligence standard which is applied to media defendants in libel claims, led to widespread outrage and criticism online, mostly along the lines of ‘Judge rules bloggers aren’t journalists’ (see Roy Greenslade in The Guardian). [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 3:00 am by Ted Folkman
The case of the day is Everplay Installation, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 11:19 am by Nissenbaum Law Group
The Federal District Court for the Southern District of New York recently decided that a licensing agreement between a television broadcast company and the owner of an animated children’s television series was fully integrated, despite a provision in the agreement which stated that the parties would execute a more detailed long form agreement in the future. 4Kids Entm’t, Inc. v. [read post]