Search for: "The State Bar Court of the State Bar of California"
Results 7901 - 7920
of 11,375
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Oct 2011, 5:00 am
Susan Illston, Judge, United States District Court, Northern District of California Aton Arbisser, Kaye Scholer LLP Elizabeth J. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 3:50 pm
Sure, it is easy for those of us in the public interest bar, such as at Public Citizen, or EFF and the ACLU which co-sponsored the California statute, to take impact cases pro bono to protect rights online, but we all have very limited resources for that work. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 10:57 am
I have long believed that states categorically should not try to regulate the Internet. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 6:35 am
[I can assure you that’s not it] pro-defense bar?). [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 5:59 am
In a major victory for the wage-and-hour plaintiffs’ bar, the California Supreme Court denied the petition for review in Brown v. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 5:00 am
OPENING SESSION A report on the state of the complex courts Honorable Steven A. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 3:27 pm
AT&T Mobility LLC., the United States District Court for the Northern District of California agreed with the conclusion of the court in Quevedo v. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 5:03 am
OCZ urged the court to strike the allegations because any claims based on them would be barred by CDA §230. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 9:58 pm
California has the largest court system in the world therefore we also have the most judges of any state in the United States. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 4:24 am
However, note the Reuters post EU court bars stem cell patents when embryos destroyed, Christians hail ruling , including the text: In March, Advocate General Yves Bot handed down a legal opinion, which the ECJ effectively upheld on Tuesday. [18 Oct 2011]IPBiz notes that, back in the days of California's Proposition 71, proponents for the stem cell bond issue argued that European scientists were getting the jump on American scientists. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 10:19 am
CELA requested that Paul Hastings be referred to the state bar ethical committee for submitting stolen evidence, since the listserv was a closed forum and the firm knew that CELA was asserting privilege. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 10:19 am
CELA requested that Paul Hastings be referred to the state bar ethical committee for submitting stolen evidence, since the listserv was a closed forum and the firm knew that CELA was asserting privilege. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 9:24 am
District Court, Northern District of California (San Francisco). [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 7:06 am
A divided three-judge panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, in San Francisco, reversed the ruling. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 7:06 am
A divided three-judge panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, in San Francisco, reversed the ruling. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 3:38 pm
The California State Bar Court affirmed the dismissal of ethics charges brought against an attorney for his handling of an appeal in a bitterly-contested domestic relations proceeding. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 7:55 pm
We're on the way back from the Brigham-Kanner Property Rights Conference in Beijing, and on our way to the California State Bar Environmental Law Section's annual conference at Yosemite N.P., which begins later this week. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 4:38 pm
The Economist reported last week that up to 48% of California's county trial courts could be rendered insolvent by the state's budget crisis.One result of the cuts to courts in California is lengthening the time an uncontested divorce takes to process through the court system; from 6 to 18 months. [read post]
15 Oct 2011, 8:02 am
* Good news: I will receive the 2011 "IP Vanguard Award" (in the Academic/Public Policy category) from the California State Bar's IP Section. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 8:33 am
Hamilton Bank of Johnson City (1985) should be overruled, to the extent that it arbitrarily denies a federal forum to regulatory takings claimants seeking just compensation for the violation of their rights under the Fifth Amendment, contrary to the intention of Congress in enacting Section 1983; and (2) whether this Court should recognize an exception to Williamson County’s “state procedures” requirement for takings claimants like petitioner, whose Fifth… [read post]
