Search for: "Court v. Administrative Office"
Results 7921 - 7940
of 13,899
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Oct 2008, 7:58 pm
Van Duyn ex rel Van Duyn v. [read post]
21 Jan 2025, 8:44 am
Now, following the Court’s decisions in Loper Bright and West Virginia v. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 11:24 am
In Methodist Health Centers v. [read post]
12 May 2010, 10:21 am
Ahmed & Ors v Murphy [2010] EWHC 453 (Admin) This was an appeal to the High Court of a decision by the London Rent Assessment Committee (LRAC) that the maximum fair rent payable by Mr Murphy for the flat in Brick Lane, Spitalfields was £8.50 per week. [read post]
12 May 2010, 10:21 am
Ahmed & Ors v Murphy [2010] EWHC 453 (Admin) This was an appeal to the High Court of a decision by the London Rent Assessment Committee (LRAC) that the maximum fair rent payable by Mr Murphy for the flat in Brick Lane, Spitalfields was £8.50 per week. [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 3:17 pm
All the attorneys at the firm are admitted to the federal courts in Florida. [read post]
19 May 2023, 4:03 pm
Justice Neil Gorsuch has the first opinion for a unanimous court in the patent case Amgen v. [read post]
28 May 2019, 7:36 am
Varga on this website) Veteran Representation at CAVC: Chris Attig, Attig | Steel, PLLC (link to bio on this website) Board of Veterans Appeals Veterans Law Judge: Michael Martin VA Regional Office: St. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 4:31 am
That is properly a question for the Supreme Court or Congress, not duelling [sic] letters from successive administrators. [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 4:00 am
For decades, the Court allowed Congress to limit the President's ability to fire leaders of multi-member independent administrative agencies, Then, in Seila Law LLC v. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 10:47 am
Patent & Trademark Office, 653 F.3d 1329 (Fed. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:47 pm
Wyeth, 07-56684 and Menes v. [read post]
24 Jun 2008, 3:49 pm
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in Doninger v. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 11:54 am
Probably most striking is that in its rush to urge the Court’s engagement in the case, the dissent opens by invoking Marbury v. [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 3:40 pm
The court interpreted Sundstrom v. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 12:40 pm
Bush administration. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 4:45 am
The standard user name of `Compaq_ administrator’ was associated with these images. [read post]
10 Sep 2021, 9:20 am
Photo credit: https://www.aclumich.org/en/issues/womens-rightsIn light of the recent Supreme Court decision allowing SB8, Texas’s restrictive abortion legislation which effectively bans all abortion after 6 weeks (and undermines nearly 50 years of constitutional precedent established by Roe v. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 10:00 pm
(On the Application of) v The Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWHC 1388 (Admin) - read judgment 1 Crown Office Row’s John Joliffe appeared for the Secretary of State the Home Department in this case. [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 1:15 am
Palmer v. [read post]
