Search for: "In Re Opinions of the Justices" Results 7921 - 7940 of 12,706
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 May 2013, 9:25 am by Kelly Buchanan
  The Ministry (or the Crown Law Office if the Ministry of Justice is the administering agency for the particular legislation) is tasked with providing an opinion to the Attorney-General as to whether or not a bill is inconsistent with the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 (BORA). [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 4:06 am by Russ Bensing
  Several justices, including Lanzinger, who wrote the Foster opinion, have bemoaned the havoc that decision wrought on the SB2 sentencing reforms. [read post]
1 Aug 2010, 9:00 pm
Beyond that, what really are the negative consequences of refusing disclosure of immigration status to those in the criminal justice system? [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 10:03 am by INFORRM
Mr Justice Warby also ordered he to make an interim payment of £120,000 costs plus the damages within 21 days. [read post]
Indeed, the State’s petition for certiorari often reads like a tribute to Kennedy/Thomas/Gorsuch jurisprudence, frequently quoting from these Justices’ prior opinions. [read post]
22 May 2012, 11:23 am by Steve Hall
The state Supreme Court, in a unanimous opinion written by Justice Dale Wainwright, disagreed, saying the state's criminal courts had shown Allen had a legitimate innocence claim and he should be paid. [read post]
18 Jul 2018, 10:28 am by Shea Denning
The court of appeals addressed the first question in yesterday’s opinion in In re T.T.E., __ N.C. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 2:47 am by SHG
Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote the majority opinion and, as Denniston says, grounded this emanation of the Constitution in no less sound a foundation than "common sense. [read post]
13 Jan 2013, 3:30 pm by Schachtman
More important, Justice Souter’s opinion fails to explain why the Court would not look beyond funding to the merits of the funded research. [read post]
26 Apr 2015, 4:59 pm by Kevin LaCroix
”   The April 22 Opinion On April 22, 2015, in an opinion written by Justice Brett Dickson, the Indiana Supreme Court reversed the lower court’s rulings in most respects and entered summary judgment in Anthem’s favor except with respect to Anthem’s bad faith claims against the excess reinsurers, which claims the Supreme Court remanded to the trial court for further proceedings. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 10:29 am by Administrator
Bailey has included a breakdown of the percentage of trial time that was wasted in the proceedings before both Justice McIsaac and myself. [read post]
2 Sep 2019, 9:00 am by law&publicservice
What that means is that your personal opinion does not control your analysis and your judgment should center on whether this is advancing the goals of the government. [read post]
12 May 2010, 5:14 am by Susan Brenner
The opinion we’re concerned with is the U.S. [read post]
18 Aug 2009, 3:46 pm by Mark A. Eskenazi
There were 19 Statements in the book that Howard Stern claimed were libelous (they’re described at pages 10 -13 of the decision). [read post]
27 Aug 2024, 2:10 am by INFORRM
It also replaced three common law defences (justification, fair comment, and Reynolds) with equivalent statutory defences (truth, honest opinion, and publication in the public interest). [read post]
11 May 2020, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Justice Kagan’s opinion for the Court unequivocally acknowledged that the jury heard evidence of “wrongdoing—deception, corruption, abuse of power. [read post]