Search for: "Label v Label"
Results 7921 - 7940
of 13,306
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Feb 2012, 7:00 am
United States v. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 6:52 am
Sukumar v. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 4:30 am
The case is captioned Shake et al. v. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 6:41 pm
” Typically, a legal consult involving dietary supplement labeling focuses on three important legal issues: the claims being made; the labeling; and substantiation. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 8:30 am
Rosenberger v. [read post]
11 Feb 2012, 12:29 pm
Essentially, Carnwath LJ endorsed the application of the test set by the European Court in A v United Kingdom and elucidated in AF (No. 3). [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 10:56 am
In AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, L.P. v Apotex Corp., the Court held for defendant generic manufacturers on the grounds that Plaintiff failed to state a 35 U.S.C. 271(e)(2) claim based on defendants’ existing ANDA filings, and claims premised on presumed future labeling amendments were not ripe for adjudication. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 10:56 am
In AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, L.P. v Apotex Corp., the Court held for defendant generic manufacturers on the grounds that Plaintiff failed to state a 35 U.S.C. 271(e)(2) claim based on defendants’ existing ANDA filings, and claims premised on presumed future labeling amendments were not ripe for adjudication. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 8:39 am
– an off-label use. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 9:42 pm
AstraZeneca Pharms. v. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 4:57 pm
Johns v. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 3:55 pm
Peter Frampton filed a suit on 23 December 2011 against record label Universal Music for half a million pounds worth of unpaid music royalties and unspecified damages, making him the latest artist to make a claim against a record label in respect of digital royalties.In 1998 Frampton contracted with A&M Records, a label owned by Universal Music, to receive a 50% royalty for the use of any "licensed" music. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 3:36 pm
” Texas v. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 9:58 am
Mazza v. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 4:11 am
The case is entitled Wang v. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 7:54 am
Co. v.. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 5:26 am
" asks @dorfonlawpjblack.me/zBjD9w #prop8 "Madonna acts just like a serious male artist would – and people hate her for it" says @naomirwolf pjblack.me/wuMBLz Image via Wikipedia this is disappointing but not surprising: "With a Signal to Donors, Obama Yields on ‘Super PACs’" pjblack.me/zgDJwq some advice from my qut colleague @_StephenH: "Eight simple rules for losing your doctoral virginity"pjblack.me/zfRLrb #highered… [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 4:00 am
In Golan v. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 11:23 am
This opinion is considerably narrower than Judge Walker’s opinion in the district court, and it relies very heavily on Romer v. [read post]
