Search for: "Level v. State"
Results 7921 - 7940
of 29,842
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Feb 2012, 1:35 pm
However, unlike Rocky V, what a great story it would be. [read post]
13 Oct 2017, 2:59 pm
See Oakville Hills Center, Inc. v. [read post]
21 May 2007, 3:43 am
All opinions are precedential unless otherwise indicated.General Mills, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 2:00 am
Where an employer’s behaviour dips below a threshold level of decency during the course of a termination, the employer may find itself exposed to “moral damages. [read post]
1 May 2007, 3:42 am
All opinions are precedential unless otherwise indicated.Intamin, LTD. v. [read post]
22 Nov 2019, 5:30 am
Several weeks ago, we published a CCPA FAQS on Cookies, which provides a high-level look at how the impending CCPA may apply to website cookies. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 8:52 am
Resources Code, § 21050 et seq.) to a state agency’s proprietary acts with respect to a state-owned and funded rail line or is CEQA not preempted in such circumstances under the market participant doctrine (see Town of Atherton v. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 4:38 pm
Sentencing Guideline § 2D1.1(a)(2) applies a base “base offense level” of 38 in certain drug cases when “the offense of conviction establishes that death or serious bodily injury resulted from the use of the substance …” On March 16, 2016, the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals in United States v. [read post]
9 Apr 2017, 8:35 am
Section V then posits an alternative analysis, normatively autonomous (though not entirely free) of the orbit of the state, a vision possible only when the ideological presumptions of the state are suspended. [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 8:02 am
In Lucent v. [read post]
13 Jan 2009, 2:35 am
See Rhodes v. [read post]
12 Sep 2024, 9:24 am
This summer, in Loper Bright Enterprises v. [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 6:03 am
United States, 217 F. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 11:08 am
United States v. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 5:30 am
The State Comptroller sustained the Hearing Officer’s determination** and Captain Bevilacqua appealed the Comptroller’s decision.The Appellate Division sustained the Comptroller’s determination, explaining that “[e]ven accepting [Captain Bevilacqua’s] testimony, the Hearing Officer concluded that [Captain Bevilacqua], who grew up in the area and described the porch as ‘one of those big old North Buffalo porches,’ should have reasonably anticipated… [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 2:43 pm
Montana, Meet Microsoft v. [read post]
15 May 2013, 5:04 am
Implied consent laws have been adopted by all 50 States. [read post]
20 Nov 2018, 7:16 am
And that omission, Stuart contended, was inconsistent with Bullcoming v. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 1:11 pm
” The case, Doe v. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 12:00 am
The court opined that "It is hornbook law that one who objects to the act of an administrative agency must exhaust available administrative remedies before being permitted to litigate [its objection] in a court of law," citing Watergate II Apts. v Buffalo Sewer Auth., 46 NY2d 52.* Addressing Facility's contention that it had raised a constitutional challenge alleging that OMIG exceeded its authority and violated Article III, §1, of the New York State… [read post]