Search for: "Levell v. State" Results 7921 - 7940 of 29,839
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 May 2007, 3:43 am
All opinions are precedential unless otherwise indicated.General Mills, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 2:00 am by Rhonda Shirreff
Where an employer’s behaviour dips below a threshold level of decency during the course of a termination, the employer may find itself exposed to “moral damages. [read post]
1 May 2007, 3:42 am
All opinions are precedential unless otherwise indicated.Intamin, LTD. v. [read post]
22 Nov 2019, 5:30 am by Mary T. Costigan and Maya Atrakchi
Several weeks ago, we published a CCPA FAQS on Cookies, which provides a high-level look at how the impending CCPA may apply to website cookies. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 8:52 am by Abbott & Kindermann
Resources Code, § 21050 et seq.) to a state agency’s proprietary acts with respect to a state-owned and funded rail line or is CEQA not preempted in such circumstances under the market participant doctrine (see Town of Atherton v. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 4:38 pm by John Floyd
Sentencing Guideline § 2D1.1(a)(2) applies a base “base offense level” of 38 in certain drug cases when “the offense of conviction establishes that death or serious bodily injury resulted from the use of the substance …”   On March 16, 2016, the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals in United States v. [read post]
9 Apr 2017, 8:35 am
Section V then posits an alternative analysis, normatively autonomous (though not entirely free) of the orbit of the state, a vision possible only when the ideological presumptions of the state are suspended. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 5:30 am by The Public Employment Law Press
The State Comptroller sustained the Hearing Officer’s determination** and Captain Bevilacqua appealed the Comptroller’s decision.The Appellate Division sustained the Comptroller’s determination, explaining that “[e]ven accepting [Captain Bevilacqua’s] testimony, the Hearing Officer concluded that [Captain Bevilacqua], who grew up in the area and described the porch as ‘one of those big old North Buffalo porches,’ should have reasonably anticipated… [read post]
20 Nov 2018, 7:16 am by David Markus
And that omission, Stuart contended, was inconsistent with Bullcoming v. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 12:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The court opined that "It is hornbook law that one who objects to the act of an administrative agency must exhaust available administrative remedies before being permitted to litigate [its  objection] in a court of law," citing Watergate II Apts. v Buffalo Sewer Auth., 46 NY2d 52.* Addressing Facility's contention that it had raised a constitutional challenge alleging that OMIG exceeded its authority and violated Article III, §1, of the New York State… [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The court opined that "It is hornbook law that one who objects to the act of an administrative agency must exhaust available administrative remedies before being permitted to litigate [its  objection] in a court of law," citing Watergate II Apts. v Buffalo Sewer Auth., 46 NY2d 52.* Addressing Facility's contention that it had raised a constitutional challenge alleging that OMIG exceeded its authority and violated Article III, §1, of the New York State… [read post]