Search for: "STATE v. FIELDS"
Results 7921 - 7940
of 12,946
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Apr 2013, 11:00 pm
The decision, UPMC Braddock v. [read post]
7 Apr 2013, 3:55 pm
The Supreme Court again reversed the defendants’ convictions in Norris v Alabama. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 7:22 am
Nordstrom, Inc. v. 7525419 Canada Inc., No. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 3:37 pm
Loving V. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 12:10 pm
Courts overwhelmed by unrepresented litigants 10:51- Good progress — several states enact legislation that earmark returns from filing fees to legal services. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 10:21 am
In 1997, CompuServe v. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 7:31 am
Local Loan Co. v. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 5:47 am
Great British Teddy Bear Co. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court in Boerne v. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 2:12 pm
The Tennessee Supreme Court recently issued an important opinion, State of Tennessee v. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 9:39 am
In the 2011 Otegi Montdragon v. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 5:31 am
If you are selling your home, you cannot close without a passing Title V inspection of your septic system, completed by an inspector who is licensed by the state and your town. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 9:01 pm
The Constitutional Right to Seek an Abortion: From Roe to Casey Before the Supreme Court’s 1973 ruling in Roe v. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 12:51 am
People carrying out transactions in U.K. markets need to have confidence that they are operating on a level-playing field with everyone else. [read post]
A Sniff Is A Search By Any Other Name, But Is It Reliable? Florida v. Jardines and Florida v. Harris
31 Mar 2013, 7:51 am
Jardines In Florida v. [read post]
A Sniff Is A Search By Any Other Name, But Is It Reliable? Florida v. Jardines and Florida v. Harris
31 Mar 2013, 7:51 am
Jardines In Florida v. [read post]
30 Mar 2013, 3:50 am
According to a theory originally developed in the field of constitutional law (see Solum here, Whittington here - or watch the Federalist Society's 12th Annual Faculty Conference here), the distinction describes the process through which a legal text becomes a coercible legal rule: in the first phase, interpretation, a linguistic meaning is attributed to the text; in the second phase, construction, a normative value is assigned to it. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 2:27 pm
The United States Supreme Court has ruled on two drug dog cases in the last few weeks: Florida v. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 9:49 am
Assocs. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 8:24 am
Nystrom v. [read post]
