Search for: "State v. N. N."
Results 7921 - 7940
of 21,439
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Mar 2008, 4:09 am
Alicea v. [read post]
19 Sep 2016, 12:08 pm
State v. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 2:00 am
End of Life Choices New York and the End of Life Liberty Project are applauding the ruling by the New York Court of Appeals to hear the appeal in the case of Myers, et. al. v. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 8:00 am
Ryan v. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 8:37 am
This very question was subject to an application for judicial review brought by BASCA, the Musicians' Union, and UK Music against UK Government.After months of uncertainty, this morning Green J issued his judgment in BASCA v The Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 1:41 pm
Expense Bd. v. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 11:36 am
See, e.g., State v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:10 am
[1] New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass’n v. [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 12:40 pm
The Court is not unmindful that this analysis appears to be at odds with the Court of Appeals decision in People v Rodriguez (68 NY2d 674 [1986], revg for reasons stated in dissenting opn of Lazer, J., 113 AD2d 337, 343-348 [2d Dept 1985]). [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 3:34 pm
Morgan (n/k/a Leary). [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 9:41 am
The decision, Tyler v. [read post]
3 Jan 2008, 10:17 pm
Here's the deal: under Williamson County Regional Planning Comm'n v. [read post]
28 Mar 2007, 10:20 am
State of Indiana (NFP) Charles N. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 8:17 am
The court noted that “[n]one of the provisions of the OGSML address traditional land use concerns, such as traffic, noise or industry suitabiliy for a particular community or neighborhood. [read post]
14 Jun 2009, 9:08 pm
See Sterling v. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 11:52 am
In Stauffer v. [read post]
7 Nov 2010, 5:46 am
CML V, LLC v. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 12:21 am
RU (Bangladesh) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 651 - Read Judgment Further to our recent post on the deportation of foreign criminals, the matter has once again come to the attention of the Court of Appeal. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 5:00 am
The Court Determines That the Complaint Fails to State a Claim for Copyright Ownership Because it Failed to Allege Facts that the Manuscript was Substantially Similar The Court held that the complaint failed to state a claim for copyright ownership because “[i]n a copyright action, the similarity between two works must concern the expression of ideas, not the ideas themselves. [read post]