Search for: "State v. Powers"
Results 7921 - 7940
of 36,866
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jan 2020, 9:05 pm
In a recent report from the Tax Policy Center, Richard Auxier analyzes state sports betting regulations after Murphy v. [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 8:17 am
In anticipation of the decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
13 Mar 2008, 12:33 pm
A.H. v. [read post]
26 Mar 2007, 11:18 pm
The first was United States v. [read post]
11 Dec 2010, 7:14 am
United States v. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 2:30 am
AM (Zimbabwe) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 4-5 December 2019. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 6:19 pm
Filburn, Lopez, and United States v. [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 6:00 am
If substantial evidence supports the administrative tribunal's decision, a reviewing court may not substitute its judgment for that of the tribunal Haug v State Univ. of N.Y. at Potsdam, 2018 NY Slip Op 06964, In deciding Haug v State University of New York at Potsday [Potsdam], a case involving student discipline, the Court of Appeals commented on some issues relevant to the standard of proof required to support an administrative tribunal's… [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 6:59 am
Cabell v. [read post]
1 Feb 2015, 12:26 pm
Doktor, and Rodman v. [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 5:30 am
” The panel declined to do so, explaining that "a three-judge panel of this Court lacks the power to overturn Circuit precedent. [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 6:00 am
If substantial evidence supports the administrative tribunal's decision, a reviewing court may not substitute its judgment for that of the tribunal Haug v State Univ. of N.Y. at Potsdam, 2018 NY Slip Op 06964, In deciding Haug v State University of New York at Potsday [Potsdam], a case involving student discipline, the Court of Appeals commented on some issues relevant to the standard of proof required to support an administrative tribunal's… [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 6:00 am
If substantial evidence supports the administrative tribunal's decision, a reviewing court may not substitute its judgment for that of the tribunal Haug v State Univ. of N.Y. at Potsdam, 2018 NY Slip Op 06964, In deciding Haug v State University of New York at Potsday [Potsdam], a case involving student discipline, the Court of Appeals commented on some issues relevant to the standard of proof required to support an administrative tribunal's… [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 8:43 am
McDermott and Jenkins v. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 5:37 am
" While law enforcement officials have been known to abuse their power, the Court says, "and there is always a risk that an office charged with care of confidential information will spring a leak . . . , totalitarian tendencies do not lurk behind every instance of a state's collection of information about those within its jurisdiction. [read post]
1 Jul 2008, 2:30 pm
Supreme Court decision in the Connecticut case of Kelo v. [read post]
13 Sep 2016, 2:40 pm
The Legislature has never hesitated to expressly state its intent to legislatively overrule a Louisiana Supreme Court decision, when that is indeed its intent. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 5:27 pm
" The Second District stated that the "circuit court departed from the essential requirements of law by failing to apply the principle espoused in Blake v. [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 12:38 pm
In NFIB v. [read post]
23 May 2024, 6:03 pm
Johnson and Shaw v. [read post]
